References

usfd

Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика

Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics

1607-07712408-9494

Vidar Ltd.

10.24835/1607-0771-2019-2-33-44

usfd-129

Research Article

Ультразвуковая диагностика в акушерстве и гинекологии

Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound

Задержка (замедление) роста плода: современные принципы диагностики, классификации и динамического наблюдения

Fetal growth restriction: a modern approach to diagnosis, classification, and surveillance

Ярыгина

Тамара Александровна

Yarygina

T. A.

chermashe@yandex.ru

Батаева

Р. С.

Bataeva

R. S.

noemail@neicon.ru

ФГБУ “Национальный медицинский исследовательский центр акушерства, гинекологии и перинатологии имени академика В.И. Кулакова” Министерства здравоохранения Российской ФедерацииРоссияResearch Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and PerinatologyRussian Federation

ФГБОУ ДПО “Российская медицинская академия непрерывного профессионального образования” Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации; ООО “Центр медицины плода МЕДИКА”РоссияRussian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Fetal Medicine CentreRussian Federation

2019

28032024

023344

2024

Ярыгина Т.А., Батаева Р.С.

Yarygina T.A., Bataeva R.S.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://usfd.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/129

В статье детально представлены унифицированные критерии диагностики задержки (замедления) роста плода, выработанные в 2016 г. ведущими мировыми экспертами и рекомендованные к применению в клинической и научной работе. Обсуждается современный подход к анализу допплерометрических параметров кровотока в системе “мать-плацентаплод”, включая расчет церебральноплацентар ного отношения. Приводятся международные принципы обследования беременных с задержкой роста плода, протоколы и алгоритмы дальнейшего наблюдения, выбора срока и метода родоразрешения, разработанные на основании доказательных многоцентровых европейских исследований.

The article presents the detailed data of the modern standardized criteria of fetal growth restriction developed in 2016 by leading world experts and recommended for use in daily clinical practice and for research. The international principles, protocols and algorithms for follow-up, timing and method of delivery for fetal growth restriction cases developed on the basis of evidence-based multicenter European studies have been provided.

задержка (замедление) роста плодацеребрально-плацентарное отношениеартерия пуповиныматочная артериявенозный протокплацентарная недостаточностьультразвуковое допплеровское исследованиеfetal growth restrictioncerebroplacental ratioumbilical arteryuterine arteryductus venosusplacental insufficiencyDoppler ultrasound

References1

Figueras F., Gratacos E., Rial M., Gull I., Krofta L., Lubusky M., Cruz-Martinez R., Cruz-Lemini M., Martinez-Rodriguez M., Socias P., Aleuanlli C., Cordero M.C.P. Revealed versus concealed criteria for placental insufficiency in an unselected obstetric population in late pregnancy (RATIO37): randomised controlled trial study protocol // BMJ Open. 2017. V. 7. No. 6. P. e014835. Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014835.

Kady S.M., Gardosi J. Perinatal mortality and fetal growth restriction // Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2004. V. 18. No. 3. P. 397-410. Doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.02.009.

Crispi F., Bijnens B., Figueras F., Bartrons J., Eixarch E., Le Noble F., Ahmed A., Gratacos E. Fetal growth restriction results in remodeled and less efficient hearts in children // Circulation. 2010. V. 121. No. 22. P. 2427-2436. Doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937995.

Gluckman P.D., Hanson M.A., Cooper C., Thornburg K.L. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease // N. Engl. J. Med. 2008. V. 359. No. 1. P. 61-73. Doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0708473.

Lindqvist P.G., Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. V. 25. No. 3. P. 258-264. Doi: 10.1002/uog.1806.

Nohuz E., Riviere O., Coste K., Vendittelli F. Is prenatal identification of small-for-gestationalage fetuses useful? // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019. Doi: 10.1002/uog.20282. [Epub ahead of print]

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction // Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. V. 121. No. 5. P. 1122-1133. Doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The investigation and management of the smallfor-gestational age fetus // RCOG Green-Top Guide lines No. 31. 2nd ed. February 2013. Minor revisions - January 2014. Режим доступа: // https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/ guidelines/gtg_31.pdf, свободный. Загл. с экрана. 15.01. 2019.

Vayssiere C., Sentilhes L., Ego A., Bernard C., Cambourieu D., Flamant C., Gascoin G., Gaudineau A., Grande G., Houfflin-Debargem V., Langerk B., Malann V., Marcorelleso P., Nizardp J., Perrotinq F., Salomon L., Senats M.V., Serryg A., Tessiers V., Truffertt P., Tsatsaris V., Arnaud C., Carbonneu B. Fetal growth restriction and intrauterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2015. V. 193. P. 10-18. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021.

Lausman A., Kingdom J., Gagnon R., Basso M., Bos H., Crane J., Davies G., Delisle M.F., Hudon L., Menticoglou S., Mundle W., Ouellet A., Pressey T., Pylypjuk C., Roggensack A., Sanderson F. Intrauterine growth restriction: screening, diagnosis, and management // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2013. V. 35. No. 8. P. 741-748. Doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30865-3.

Макаров И.О., Юдина Е.В., Боровкова Е.И. За держка роста плода. Врачебная тактика: Учебное пособие. М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2014. 56 с.

Unterscheider J., Daly S., Geary M.P., Kennelly M.M., McAuliffe F.M., O’Donoghue K., Hunter A., Morrison J.J., Burke G., Dicker P., Tully E.C., Malone F.D. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. V. 208. No. 4. P. 290.e1-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.007.

Vasak B., Koenen S.V., Koster M.P., Hukkelhoven C.W., Franx A., Hanson M.A., Visser G.H. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015. V. 45. No. 2. P. 162-167. Doi: 10.1002/uog.14644.

Monier I., Blondel B., Ego A., Kaminski M., Goffinet F., Zeitlin J. Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study // BJOG. 2015. V. 122. No. 4. P. 518-527. Doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13148.

Gordijn S.J., Beune I.M., Thilaganathan B., Papageorghiou A., Baschat A.A., Baker P.N., Silver R.M., Wynia K., Ganzevoort W. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016. V. 48. No. 3. P. 333-339. Doi: 10.1002/uog.15884.

Sotiriadis A., Hernandez-Andrade E., da Silva Costa F., Ghi T., Glanc P., Khalil A., Martins W.P., Odibo A.O., Papageorghiou A.T., Salomon L.J., Thilaganathan B., ISUOG CSC Pre-eclampsia Task Force. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2019. V. 53. No. 1. P. 7-22. Doi: 10.1002/uog.20105.

Nassr A.A., Abdelmagied A.M., Shazly S.A. Fetal cerebro-placental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and diagnostic performance // J. Perinat. Med. 2016. V. 44. No. 2. P. 249-256. Doi: 10.1515/jpm-2015-0274.

Conde-Agudelo A., Villar J., Kennedy S.H., Papageorghiou A.T. Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018. V. 52. No. 4. P. 430-441. Doi: 10.1002/uog.19117.

Kehl S., Dotsch J., Hecher K., Schlembach D., Schmitz D., Stepan H., Gembruch U. Intrauterine growth restriction. Guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/080, October 2016) // Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017. V. 77. No. 11. P. 1157-1173. Doi: 10.1055/s-0043-118908.

Chauhan S.P., Gupta L.M., Hendrix N.W., Berghella V., American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. V. 200. No. 4. P. 409.e1-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.025.

South Australian Perinatal Practice Guidelines. Fetal growth (restricted). 2011. Режим доступа: //https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/156243804ee473e0bed4bfd150ce4f37/Fetalgrowth-restricted-WCHN-PPG-22112011.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE-156243804ee473e0bed4bfd150ce4f37-mMyZ5xA, свободный. Загл. с экрана. 15.01.2019.

Nabhan A.F., Abdelmoula Y.A. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials // Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2009. V. 104. No. 3. P. 184-188. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.10.018.

Nabhan A.F., Abdelmoula Y.A. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008. V. 16. No. 3. P. CD006593. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006593.pub2.

Kehl S., Schelkle A., Thomas A., Puhl A., Meqdad K., Tuschy B., Berlit S., Weiss C., Bayer C., Heimrich J., Dammer U., Raabe E., Winkler M., Faschingbauer F., Beckmann M.W., Sutterlin M. Single deepest vertical pocket or amniotic fluid index as evaluation test for predicting adverse pregnancy outcome (SAFE trial): a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016. V. 47. No. 6. P. 674-679. Doi: 10.1002/uog.14924.

Figueras F., Gratacos E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol // Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2014. V. 36. No. 2. P. 86-98. Doi: 10.1159/000357592.

Morales-Rosello J., Khalil A. Fetal cerebral redistribution: a marker of compromise regardless of fetal size // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015. V. 46. No. 4. P. 385-388. Doi: 10.1002/uog.15664.

Flood K., Unterscheider J., Daly S., Geary M.P., Kennelly M.M., McAuliffe F.M., O’Donoghue K., Hunter A., Morrison J.J., Burke G., Dicker P., Tully E.C., Malone F.D. The role of brain sparing in the prediction of adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction: results of the multicenter PORTO Study // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014. V. 211. No. 3. P. 288.e1-5. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.008.

Khalil A.A., Morales-Rosello J., Elsaddig M., Khan N., Papageorghiou A., Bhide A., Thilaganathan B. The association between fetal Doppler and admission to neonatal unit at term // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015. V. 213. No. 1. P. 57.e1-57. e7. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.013.

Khalil A.A., Morales-Rosello J., Morlando M., Hannan H., Bhide A., Papageorghiou A., Thilaganathan B. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015. V. 213. No. 1. P. 54.e1-54.e10.Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.10.024.

Boers K.E., Vijgen S.M., Bijlenga D., van der Post J.A., Bekedam D.J., Kwee A., van der Salm P.C., van Pampus M.G., Spaanderman M.E., de Boer K., Duvekot J.J., Bremer H.A., Hasaart T.H., Delemarre F.M., Bloemenkamp K.W., van Meir C.A., Willekes C., Wijnen E.J., Rijken M., le Cessie S., Roumen F.J., Thornton J.G., van Lith J.M., Mol B.W., Scherjon S.A.; DIGITAT study group. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT) // BMJ. 2010. V. 341. P. c7087. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.c7087.

Van Wyk L., Boers K.E., van der Post J.A., van Pampus M.G., van Wassenaer A.G., van Baar A.L., Spaanderdam M.E., Becker J.H., Kwee A., Duvekot J.J., Bremer H.A., Delemarre F.M., Bloemenkamp K.W., de Groot C.J., Willekes C., Roumen F.J., van Lith J.M., Mol B.W., le Cessie S., Scherjon S.A.; DIGITAT Study Group. Effects on (neuro)developmental and behavioral outcome at 2 years of age of induced labor compared with expectant management in intrauterine growthrestricted infants: long-term outcomes of the DIGITAT trial // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012. V. 206. No. 5. P. 406.e1-406.e7. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.003.

Boers K.E., van Wyk L., van der Post J.A., Kwee A., van Pampus M.G., Spaanderdam M.E., Duvekot J.J., Bremer H.A., Delemarre F.M., Bloemenkamp K.W., de Groot C.J., Willekes C., Rijken M., Roumen F.J., Thornton J.G., van Lith J.M., Mol B.W., le Cessie S., Scherjon S.A.; DIGITAT Study Group. Neonatal morbidity after induction vs expectant monitoring in intrauterine growth restriction at term: a subanalysis of the DIGITAT RCT // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012. V. 206. No. 4. P. 344.e1-344.e7. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.015.

Caradeux J., Martinez-Portilla R.J., Basuki T.R., Kiserud T., Figueras F. Risk of fetal death in growth-restricted fetuses with umbilical and/or ductus venosus absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities before 34 weeks of gestation: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018. V. 218. No. 2S. P. S774-S782.e21. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.566.

Ganzevoort W., Mensing van Charante N., Thilaganathan B., Prefumo F., Arabin B., Bilardo C.M., Brezinka C., Derks J.B., Diemert A., Duvekot J.J., Ferrazzi E., Frusca T., Hecher K., Marlow N., Martinelli P., Ostermayer E., Papageorghiou A.T., Schlembach D., Schneider K.T.M., Todros T., Valcamonico A., Visser G.H.A., Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A., Lees C.C., Wolf H.; TRUFFLE Group. How to monitor pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction and delivery before 32 weeks: post-hoc analysis of TRUFFLE study // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017. V. 49. No. 6. P. 769-777. Doi: 10.1002/uog.17433.

Lees C., Baumgartner H. The TRUFFLE study - a collaborative publicly funded project from concept to reality: how to negotiate an ethical, administrative and funding obstacle course in the European Union // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. V. 25. No. 2. P. 105-107. Doi: 10.1002/uog.1836.

Lees C.C., Marlow N., van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A., Arabin B., Bilardo C.M., Brezinka C., Calvert S., Derks J.B., Diemert A., Duvekot J.J., Ferrazzi E., Frusca T., Ganzevoort W., Hecher K., Martinelli P., Ostermayer E., Papageorghiou A.T., Schlembach D., Schneider K.T., Thilaganathan B., Todros T., Valcamonico A., Visser G.H., Wolf H.; TRUFFLE study group. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a ran domised trial // Lancet. 2015. V. 385. No. 9983. P. 2162-2172. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3.

Frusca T., Todros T., Lees C., Bilardo C.M., TRUFFLE Investigators. Outcome in early-onset fetal growth restriction is best combining computerized fetal heart rate analysis with ductus venosus Doppler: insights from the Trial of Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018. V. 218. No. 2S. P. S783-S789. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.226.

Stampalija T., Arabin B., Wolf H., Bilardo C.M., Lees C.; TRUFFLE investigators. Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction? // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017. V. 216. No. 5. P. 521. e1-521.e13. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.001.

Visser G.H.A., Bilardo C.M., Derks J.B., Ferrazzi E., Fratelli N., Frusca T., Ganzevoort W., Lees C.C., Napolitano R., Todros T., Wolf H., Hecher K.; TRUFFLE group investigators. Fetal monitoring indications for delivery and 2-year outcome in 310 infants with fetal growth restriction delivered before 32 weeks' gestation in the TRUFFLE study // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2017. V. 50. No. 3. P. 347-352. Doi: 10.1002/uog.17361.

Baschat A.A., Galan H.L., Bhide A., Berg C., Kush M.L., Oepkes D., Thilaganathan B., Gembruch U., Harman C.R. Doppler and biophysical assessment in growth restricted fetuses: distribution of test results // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006. V. 27. No. 1. P. 41-47. Doi: 10.1002/uog.2657.

Kaur S., Picconi J.L., Chadha R., Kruger M., Mari G. Biophysical profile in the treatment of intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses who weigh <1000 g // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. V. 199. No. 3. P. 264.e1-264.e4. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.074.

Lalor J.G., Fawole B., Alfirevic Z., Devane D. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2008. V. 1. P. CD000038. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000038.pub2.

Fenton T.R., Kim J.H. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants // BMC Pediatr. 2013. V. 59. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59.

Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родо-вспоможения в Российской Федерации за 2017 г. М.: Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации, 2018. 171 с.

Акушерско-гинекологическая база данных Astraia. Версия 1.23. Руководство пользователя. 2012. С. 38.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.