usfdУльтразвуковая и функциональная диагностикаUltrasound & Functional Diagnostics1607-07712408-9494Vidar Ltd.10.24835/1607-0771-308usfd-308Research ArticleУльтразвуковая диагностика в акушерстве и гинекологииObstetrics and Gynecology UltrasoundПрогностическое значение ультразвукового измерения нижнего сегмента матки при беременности у женщин с рубцом после кесарева сечения: обзор литературыPrognostic value of ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment during pregnancy in women with a scar after cesarean section: literature reviewhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5955-7979ЭсетовМ. А.EsetovM. A.

Эсетов Мурад Азединович – доктор мед. наук, доцент кафедры лучевой диагностики и лучевой терапии с курсом ультразвуковой диагностики ФГБОУ ВО “Дагестанский государственный медицинский университет” Минздрава России; врач­-эксперт ультразвуковой диагностики в перинатологии и гинекологии ООО “Целитель”, Махачкалаhttps://orsid.org/0000-0001-5955-7979 

Murad A. Esetov – MD, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, with a course in ultrasound diagnostics, Dagestan State Medical University;  physician expert in ultrasound diagnostics in perinatology and gynecology, Medical Center “Celitel”, Makhachkalahttps://orsid.org/0000-0001-5955-7979 

esetov06@rambler.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-3083КаллаеваА. Н.KallaevaA. N.

Каллаева Абидат Нурисламовна – доктор мед. наук, доцент кафедры лучевой диагностики и лучевой терапии с курсом ультразвуковой диагностики ФГБОУ ВО “Дагестанский государственный медицинский университет” Минздрава России, Махачкалаhttps://orsid.org/0000-0003-2164-3083

Abidat N. Kallaeva – MD, Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy, with a course in ultrasound diagnostics, Dagestan State Medical University, Makhachkalahttps://orsid.org/0000-0003-2164-3083 

ФГБОУ ВО “Дагестанский государственный медицинский университет” Минздрава России; ООО “Целитель”РоссияDagestan State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian Federation; Medical Center “Celitel”Russian FederationФГБОУ ВО “Дагестанский государственный медицинский университет” Минздрава РоссииРоссияDagestan State Medical University, Ministry of Healthcare of Russian FederationRussian Federation2025070520253125766Copyright © Эсетов М.А., Каллаева А.Н., 20252025Эсетов М.А., Каллаева А.Н.Esetov M.A., Kallaeva A.N.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://usfd.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/308

Представлен обзор источников литературы, в которых проводилось измерение нижнего сегмента матки у беременных с рубцом на матке с целью прогнозирования разрыва матки. Результаты обзора показали гетерогенность исследований, отсутствие согласованного порога толщины нижнего сегмента, что делает прогнозирование риска разрыва матки на основе измерения нижнего сегмента у женщин с рубцом на матке неопределенным и необоснованным. 

The article presents a review of literature focusing on the measurement of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with a uterine scar in order to predict the risk of uterine rupture. The results of the review demonstrated heterogeneity among studies and the absence of an agreed threshold for lower segment thickness, which makes predicting the risk of uterine rupture based on lower segment measurements in women with a uterine scar uncertain and unreasonable.

ультразвуковая диагностикарубец на маткенижний сегментразрыв маткиultrasounduterine scarlower segmentuterine ruptureнетReferencesHellerstein S., Feldman S., Duan T. China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG. 2015; 122: 160–164. http://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12971Hellerstein S., Feldman S., Duan T. China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG. 2015; 122: 160–164. http://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12971Cui X., Wu S. Ultrasonic assessment has high sensitivity for pregnant women with previous cesarean section occurring uterine dehiscence and rupture: A STARD-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99 (31): e21448. http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021448Cui X., Wu S. Ultrasonic assessment has high sensitivity for pregnant women with previous cesarean section occurring uterine dehiscence and rupture: A STARD-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99 (31): e21448. http://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021448Курцер М.А., Бреслав И.Ю., Барыкина О.П., Скрябин Н.В., Нигматуллина Э.Р. Расползание рубца на матке после кесарева сечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2022; 2: 59–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.2.59-64Kurtser M.A., Breslav I.Yu., Barykina O.P. et al. Uterine scar dehiscence following caesarean section. Obstetrics and Gynecology” (Moscow). 2022; 2: 59–64. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2022.2.59-64 (In Russian)Клинические рекомендации “Послеоперационный рубец на матке, требующий предоставления медицинской помощи матери во время беременности, родов и в послеродовом периоде”. 2024. Российское общество акушеров-гинекологов. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/635_2? (дата обращения 5.09.2024)Clinical practice guidelines “Postoperative uterine scar requiring maternal medical care during pregnancy, partum and the postpartum period”. 2024. Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/635_2? (2024, accessed 5.09.2024) (In Russian)MacDorman M., Declercq E., Menacker F. Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clin. Perinatol. 2011; 38 (2): 179–192. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007MacDorman M., Declercq E., Menacker F. Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clin. Perinatol. 2011; 38 (2): 179–192. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007McMahon M.J., Luther E.R., Bowes W.A. Jr., Olshan A.F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 335 (10): 689–695. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199609053351001McMahon M.J., Luther E.R., Bowes W.A. Jr., Olshan A.F. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N. Engl. J. Med. 1996; 335 (10): 689–695. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199609053351001Lydon-Rochelle M., Holt V.L., Easterling T.R., Martin D.P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 345 (1): 3–8. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200107053450101.Lydon-Rochelle M., Holt V.L., Easterling T.R., Martin D.P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 345 (1): 3–8. http://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200107053450101.Hofmeyr G.J., Say L., Gülmezoglu A.M. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG. 2005; 112 (9): 1221–1228. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.xHofmeyr G.J., Say L., Gülmezoglu A.M. WHO systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity: the prevalence of uterine rupture. BJOG. 2005; 112 (9): 1221–1228. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.xZhao Y., Tu J., Chang Y. et al. Clinical analysis of incomplete rupture of the uterus secondary to previous cesarean section. Open Med. (Wars). 2024; 19 (1): 20240927. http://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0927Zhao Y., Tu J., Chang Y. et al. Clinical analysis of incomplete rupture of the uterus secondary to previous cesarean section. Open Med. (Wars). 2024; 19 (1): 20240927. http://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0927Шмаков Р.Г., Баев О.Р., Пекарев О.Г., Пырегов А.В., Карапетян А.О., Приходько А.М. Хирургическая тактика операции кесарева сечения: Учебное пособие. М.: Издательский дом «Бином», 2019. 82 c.Shmakov R.G., Baev O.R., Pekarev O.G. et al. Surgical tactics of cesarean section operation. Tutorial. Moscow: Binom Publishing House, 2019. 82 p. (In Russian)Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: ACOG practice bulletin №205 summary. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 133 (2): 393–395. http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003079Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: ACOG practice bulletin №205 summary. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019; 133 (2): 393–395. http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003079Jastrow N., Chaillet N., Roberge S. et al. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2010; 32 (4): 321–327. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9Jastrow N., Chaillet N., Roberge S. et al. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2010; 32 (4): 321–327. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34475-9Kok N., Wiersma I.C., Opmeer B.C. et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 42: 132–139. http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12479Kok N., Wiersma I.C., Opmeer B.C. et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 42: 132–139. http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12479Whiting P., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B. et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2003; 3: 25. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-25Whiting P., Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B. et al. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2003; 3: 25. http://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-3-25Sharma C., Surya M., Soni A. et al. Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India. 2015; 65 (2): 97–103. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0630-4Sharma C., Surya M., Soni A. et al. Sonographic prediction of scar dehiscence in women with previous cesarean section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India. 2015; 65 (2): 97–103. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0630-4Bujold E., Jastrow N., Simoneau J. et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 201 (3): 320.e1–e6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.014Bujold E., Jastrow N., Simoneau J. et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 201 (3): 320.e1–e6. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.014Gizzo S., Zambon A., Saccardi C. et al. Effective anatomical and functional status of the lower uterine segment at term: estimating the risk of uterine dehiscence by ultrasound. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 99 (2): 496–501. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019Gizzo S., Zambon A., Saccardi C. et al. Effective anatomical and functional status of the lower uterine segment at term: estimating the risk of uterine dehiscence by ultrasound. Fertil. Steril. 2013; 99 (2): 496–501. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.10.019Hoffmann J., Exner M., Bremicker K. et al. Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3T MRI. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19 (1): 160. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2314-7Hoffmann J., Exner M., Bremicker K. et al. Comparison of the lower uterine segment in pregnant women with and without previous cesarean section in 3T MRI. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19 (1): 160. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2314-7Sen S., Malik S., Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2004; 87 (3): 215–219. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.07.023Sen S., Malik S., Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation of lower uterine segment thickness in patients of previous cesarean section. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2004; 87 (3): 215–219. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.07.023Swift B..E., Shah PS., Farine D. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019; 98 (7): 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13585Swift B.E., Shah P.S., Farine D. Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness after prior cesarean section to predict uterine rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019; 98 (7): 830–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13585Marchant I., Lessard L., Bergeron C. et al. Measurement of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness to Detect Uterine Scar Defect: Comparison of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. 2023; 42 (7): 1491–1496. http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16161Marchant I., Lessard L., Bergeron C. et al. Measurement of Lower Uterine Segment Thickness to Detect Uterine Scar Defect: Comparison of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Ultrasound. Ultrasound Med. 2023; 42 (7): 1491–1496. http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16161Sarwar I., Akram F., Khan A. et al. Validity Of Transabdominal Ultrasound Scan In The Prediction Of Uterine Scar Thickness. J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad. 2020; 32 (1): 68–72.Sarwar I., Akram F., Khan A. et al. Validity Of Transabdominal Ultrasound Scan In The Prediction Of Uterine Scar Thickness. J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad. 2020; 32 (1): 68–72.Cheung V.Y.T., Constantinescu O.C., Ahluwalia B.S. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery. J. Ultrasound Med. 2004; 23 (11): 1441–1447. http://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2004.23.11.1441Cheung V.Y.T., Constantinescu O.C., Ahluwalia B.S. Sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean delivery. J. Ultrasound Med. 2004; 23 (11): 1441–1447. http://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2004.23.11.1441Kement M., Kement C.E., Kokanali M.K., Doganay M. Prediction of uterine dehiscence via machine learning by using lower uterine segment thickness and clinical features. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022; 2 (4): 100085. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100085Kement M., Kement C.E., Kokanali M.K., Doganay M. Prediction of uterine dehiscence via machine learning by using lower uterine segment thickness and clinical features. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022; 2 (4): 100085. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100085Rozenberg P., Sénat M.V., Deruelle P. et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment before delivery of women with a prior cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226 (2): 253. e1–253.e9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.005Rozenberg P., Sénat M.V., Deruelle P. et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of ultrasound measurement of the lower uterine segment before delivery of women with a prior cesarean delivery: a randomized trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 226 (2): 253. e1–253.e9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.005Савина Л.В., Ящук А.Г., Масленников А.В., Савин А.М. Критерии отбора женщин с рубцом на матке на родоразрешение через естественные родовые пути. В сборнике: Материалы Всеармейской научно-практической конференции, посвященной 180-летию клиники акушерства и гинекологии Военно-медицинской академии им. С.М. Кирова. Санкт-Петербург: Военно-медицинская академия имени С.М. Кирова, 2022: 82–90.Savina L.V., Yashchuk AG., Maslennikov A.M., Savin A.M. Criteria for the selection of women with a uterine scar for delivery through the natural canal. In: Materials of the All-Army Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the 180th Anniversary of the Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy. Saint Petersburg, Military Medical Academy named of the S.M. Kirov. 2022: 82–90. (In Russian)Savukyne E., Machtejeviene E., Kliucinskas M., Paskauskas S. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58 (3): 407. http://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030407Savukyne E., Machtejeviene E., Kliucinskas M., Paskauskas S. Cesarean Scar Thickness Decreases during Pregnancy: A Prospective Longitudinal. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58 (3): 407. http://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030407McLeish S.F., Murchison A.B., Smith D.M. et al. Predicting Uterine Rupture Risk Using Lower Uterine Segment Measurement During Pregnancy with Cesarean History: How Reliable Is It? A Review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2023; 78 (5): 302–308. http://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001143McLeish S.F., Murchison A.B., Smith D.M. et al. Predicting Uterine Rupture Risk Using Lower Uterine Segment Measurement During Pregnancy with Cesarean History: How Reliable Is It? A Review. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2023; 78 (5): 302–308. http://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001143Yang H., Zhao Y., Tu J. et al. Clinical analysis of incomplete rupture of the uterus secondary to previous cesarean section. Open Med. (Wars). 2024; 19 (1): 2 0240927. http://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0927Yang H., Zhao Y., Tu J. et al. Clinical analysis of incomplete rupture of the uterus secondary to previous cesarean section. Open Med. (Wars). 2024; 19 (1): 2 0240927. http://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-0927Paquette K., Markey S., Roberge S. et al. First and third trimester uterine scar thickness in women after previous caesarean: A prospective comparative study. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Can. 2019; 41 (1): 59–63. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.02.020Paquette K., Markey S., Roberge S. et al. First and third trimester uterine scar thickness in women after previous caesarean: A prospective comparative study. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Can. 2019; 41 (1): 59–63. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.02.020

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.