<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="review-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">usfd</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ultrasound &amp; Functional Diagnostics</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1607-0771</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2408-9494</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Vidar Ltd.</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">usfd-396</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Ультразвуковая диагностика в акушерстве и гинекологии</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology Ultrasound</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Практические рекомендации ISUOG: проведение ультразвукового исследования плода в первом триместре беременности. Международное общество ультразвуковой диагностики в акушерстве и гинекологии (ISUOG)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Salomon</surname><given-names>L. J.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Salomon</surname><given-names>L. J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Alfirevic</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Alfirevic</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Bilardo</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bilardo</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Chalouhi</surname><given-names>G. E.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Chalouhi</surname><given-names>G. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-4"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ghi</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ghi</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-5"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Kagan</surname><given-names>K. O.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kagan</surname><given-names>K. O.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-6"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Lau</surname><given-names>T. K.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lau</surname><given-names>T. K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-7"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Papageorghiou</surname><given-names>A. T.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Papageorghiou</surname><given-names>A. T.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-8"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>RaineFenning</surname><given-names>N. J.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>RaineFenning</surname><given-names>N. J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-9"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Stirnemann</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Stirnemann</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-10"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Suresh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Suresh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-11"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Tabor</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Tabor</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-12"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>TimorTritsch</surname><given-names>I. E.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>TimorTritsch</surname><given-names>I. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-13"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Toi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Toi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-14"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Yeo</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Yeo</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-15"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Paris Descartes University;&#13;
Assistance PubliqueHopitaux de Paris;&#13;
Hopital Necker Enfants<country>Франция</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Hopital Necker Enfants<country>France</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="en">University of Liverpool<country>United Kingdom</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-3"><aff xml:lang="ru">University Medical Centre Groningen<country>Нидерланды</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University Medical Centre Groningen<country>Netherlands</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-4"><aff xml:lang="ru">Hopital Necker Enfants<country>Франция</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Hopital Necker Enfants<country>France</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-5"><aff xml:lang="ru">University of Bologna<country>Италия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University of Bologna<country>Italy</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-6"><aff xml:lang="ru">University of Tuebingen<country>Германия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University of Tuebingen<country>Germany</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-7"><aff xml:lang="ru">Paramount Clinic, Central<country>Гонконг</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-8"><aff xml:lang="ru">University of London<country>Великобритания</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University of London<country>United Kingdom</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-9"><aff xml:lang="ru">University of Nottingham<country>Великобритания</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University of Nottingham<country>United Kingdom</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-10"><aff xml:lang="ru">University Paris Descartes<country>Франция</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University Paris Descartes,<country>France</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-11"><aff xml:lang="ru">Mediscan Systems &amp; Fetal Care Research Foundation, Mylapore<country>Индия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Mediscan Systems &amp; Fetal Care Research Foundation, Mylapore<country>India</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-12"><aff xml:lang="ru">Copenhagen University Hospital<country>Дания</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Copenhagen University Hospital<country>Denmark</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-13"><aff xml:lang="ru">New York University School of Medicine<country>Соединённые Штаты Америки</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">New York University School of Medicine<country>United States</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-14"><aff xml:lang="ru">University of Toronto<country>Канада</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">University of Toronto<country>Canada</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-15"><aff xml:lang="ru">KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital<country>Сингапур</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital<country>Singapore</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2015</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>03</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Salomon L.J., Alfirevic Z., Bilardo C.M., Chalouhi G.E., Ghi T., Kagan K.O., Lau T.K., Papageorghiou A.T., RaineFenning N.J., Stirnemann J., Suresh S., Tabor A., TimorTritsch I.E., Toi A., Yeo G., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Salomon L.J., Alfirevic Z., Bilardo C.M., Chalouhi G.E., Ghi T., Kagan K.O., Lau T.K., Papageorghiou A.T., RaineFenning N.J., Stirnemann J., Suresh S., Tabor A., TimorTritsch I.E., Toi A., Yeo G.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Salomon L.J., Alfirevic Z., Bilardo C.M., Chalouhi G.E., Ghi T., Kagan K.O., Lau T.K., Papageorghiou A.T., RaineFenning N.J., Stirnemann J., Suresh S., Tabor A., TimorTritsch I.E., Toi A., Yeo G.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://usfd.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/396">https://usfd.vidar.ru/jour/article/view/396</self-uri><abstract><p>дан­ное ру­ко­вод­ст­во яв­ля­ет­ся пе­ре­во­дом ори­ги­наль­ной вер­сии, опуб­ли­ко­ван­ной ISUOG. Пе­ре­вод был вы­пол­нен экс­пер­та­ми в этой об­ла­с­ти и от­ре­дак­ти­ро­ван не­за­ви­си­мы­ми ре­цен­зен­та­ми, вла­де­ю­щи­ми со­от­вет­ст­ву­ю­щим язы­ком. Не­смо­т­ря на то что сде­ла­но все воз­мож­ное, что­бы не до­пу­с­тить ис­ка­же­ния ос­нов­но­го смыс­ла, про­цесс пе­ре­во­да мог при­ве­с­ти к не­боль­шим ва­ри­а­ци­ям смыс­ло­вых от­тен­ков при ис­поль­зо­ва­нии не­ко­то­рых слов или тер­ми­нов. Та­ким об­ра­зом, ISUOG под­чер­ки­ва­ет, что пе­ре­ве­ден­ное ру­ко­вод­ст­во не мо­жет рас­сма­т­ри­вать­ся как аб­со­лют­но точ­ная ко­пия ори­ги­на­ла, и не не­сет от­вет­ст­вен­но­с­ти за ка­кие-ли­бо не­со­от­вет­ст­вия, по­сколь­ку текст ру­ко­вод­ст­ва про­шел про­це­ду­ру офи­ци­аль­но­го одо­б­ре­ния ISUOG толь­ко в его ори­ги­наль­ной пе­чат­ной вер­сии на ан­г­лий­ском язы­ке.</p><p>Оригинальный текст руководства “ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan” опубликован в журнале “Ultrasound in Obstetrics &amp; Gynecology” (2013; 41: 102–113) и на сайте: http://www.isuog.org</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>These guidelines may have been translated, from the originals published by ISUOG, by recognized experts in the field and have been independently verified by reviewers with a relevant first language. Although all reasonable endeavors have been made to ensure that no fundamental meaning has been changed the process of trans-lation may naturally result in small variations in words or terminology and so ISUOG makes no claim that trans-lated guidelines can be considered to be an exact copy of the original and accepts no liability for the consequence of any variations. The CSC's guidelines are only officially approved by the ISUOG in their English published form.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>беременность</kwd><kwd>первый триместр</kwd><kwd>ультразвуковое исследование</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>first-trimester</kwd><kwd>fetal</kwd><kwd>ultrasound scan</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salomon L.J., Alfirevic Z., Berghella V., Bilardo C., Hernandez-Andrade E., Johnsen S.L., Kalache K., Leung K.Y., Malinger G., Munoz H., Prefumo F., Toi A., Lee W; ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 116-126.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salomon L.J., Alfirevic Z., Berghella V., Bilardo C., Hernandez-Andrade E., Johnsen S.L., Kalache K., Leung K.Y., Malinger G., Munoz H., Prefumo F., Toi A., Lee W; ISUOG Clinical Standards Committee. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 116-126.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deter R.L., Buster J.E., Casson P.R., Carson S.A. Individual growth patterns in the first trimester: evidence for difference in embryonic and fetal growth rates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 90-98.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deter R.L., Buster J.E., Casson P.R., Carson S.A. Individual growth patterns in the first trimester: evidence for difference in embryonic and fetal growth rates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 13: 90-98.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blaas H.G. The examination of the embryo and early fetus: how and by whom? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:153-158.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blaas H.G. The examination of the embryo and early fetus: how and by whom? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;14:153-158.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whitworth M., Bricker L., Neilson J.P., Dowswell T. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 4: CD007058.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Whitworth M., Bricker L., Neilson J.P., Dowswell T. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 4: CD007058.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bennett K.A., Crane J.M.G., O’Shea P., Lacelle J., Hutchens D., Copel J.A. First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1077-1081.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bennett K.A., Crane J.M.G., O’Shea P., Lacelle J., Hutchens D., Copel J.A. First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1077-1081.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoffman C.S., Messer L.C., Mendola P., Savitz D.A., Herring A.H., Hartmann K.E. Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008; 22: 587-596.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoffman C.S., Messer L.C., Mendola P., Savitz D.A., Herring A.H., Hartmann K.E. Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008; 22: 587-596.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taipale P., Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 189-194.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taipale P., Hiilesmaa V. Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 189-194.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skalkidou A., Kieler H., Stephansson O., Roos N., Cnattingius S., Haglund B. Ultrasound pregnancy dating leads to biased perinatal morbidity and neonatal mortality among post-term-born girls. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 791-796.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skalkidou A., Kieler H., Stephansson O., Roos N., Cnattingius S., Haglund B. Ultrasound pregnancy dating leads to biased perinatal morbidity and neonatal mortality among post-term-born girls. Epidemiology 2010; 21: 791-796.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harrington D.J., MacKenzie I.Z., Thompson K., Fleminger M., Greenwood C. Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labor for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomized controlled trial of 463 women. BJOG 2006; 113: 171-176.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harrington D.J., MacKenzie I.Z., Thompson K., Fleminger M., Greenwood C. Does a first trimester dating scan using crown rump length measurement reduce the rate of induction of labor for prolonged pregnancy? An uncompleted randomized controlled trial of 463 women. BJOG 2006; 113: 171-176.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ott W.J. Accurate gestational dating: revisited. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 404-408.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ott W.J. Accurate gestational dating: revisited. Am J Perinatol 1994; 11: 404-408.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wisser J., Dirschedl P., Krone S. Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 457-462.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wisser J., Dirschedl P., Krone S. Estimation of gestational age by transvaginal sonographic measurement of greatest embryonic length in dated human embryos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994; 4: 457-462.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tunon K., Eik-Nes S.H., Grottum P., Von During V., Kahn J.A. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 41-46.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tunon K., Eik-Nes S.H., Grottum P., Von During V., Kahn J.A. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 41-46.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grange G., Pannier E., Goffinet F., Cabrol D., Zorn J.R. Dating biometry during the first trimester: accuracy of an every-day practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 88: 61-64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grange G., Pannier E., Goffinet F., Cabrol D., Zorn J.R. Dating biometry during the first trimester: accuracy of an every-day practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000; 88: 61-64.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chalouhi G.E., Bernard J.P., Benoist G., Nasr B., Ville Y., Salomon L.J. A comparison of first trimester measurements for prediction of delivery date. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 24: 51-57.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chalouhi G.E., Bernard J.P., Benoist G., Nasr B., Ville Y., Salomon L.J. A comparison of first trimester measurements for prediction of delivery date. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011; 24: 51-57.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salomon L.J., Pizzi C., Gasparrini A., Bernard J.-P., Ville Y. Prediction of the date of delivery based on first trimester ultrasound measurements: an independent method from estimated date of conception. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salomon L.J., Pizzi C., Gasparrini A., Bernard J.-P., Ville Y. Prediction of the date of delivery based on first trimester ultrasound measurements: an independent method from estimated date of conception. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Caughey A.B., Nicholson J.M., Washington A.E. First vs second trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 703.e1-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Caughey A.B., Nicholson J.M., Washington A.E. First vs second trimester ultrasound: the effect on pregnancy dating and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 703.e1-6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Thorsell M., Kaijser M., Almstrom H., Andolf E. Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period - obstetric outcome when dates mismatch. BJOG 2008; 115: 585-589.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Thorsell M., Kaijser M., Almstrom H., Andolf E. Expected day of delivery from ultrasound dating versus last menstrual period - obstetric outcome when dates mismatch. BJOG 2008; 115: 585-589.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bottomley C., Bourne T. Dating and growth in the first trimester. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 4: 439-452.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bottomley C., Bourne T. Dating and growth in the first trimester. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 4: 439-452.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sonek J. First trimester ultrasonography in screening and detection of fetal anomalies. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2007; 145: 45-61.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sonek J. First trimester ultrasonography in screening and detection of fetal anomalies. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2007; 145: 45-61.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Snijders R.J., Johnson S., Sebire N.J., Noble P.L., Nicolaides K.H. First-trimester ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 216-226.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Snijders R.J., Johnson S., Sebire N.J., Noble P.L., Nicolaides K.H. First-trimester ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7: 216-226.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ville Y. ‘Ceci n’est pas une echographie’: a plea for quality assessment in prenatal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 1-5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ville Y. ‘Ceci n’est pas une echographie’: a plea for quality assessment in prenatal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 1-5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abramowicz J.S., Kossoff G., Marsal K., Ter Haar G. Safety Statement, 2000 (reconfirmed 2003). International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abramowicz J.S., Kossoff G., Marsal K., Ter Haar G. Safety Statement, 2000 (reconfirmed 2003). International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Torloni M.R., Vedmedovska N., Merialdi M., Betran A.P., Allen T., Gonzalez R., Platt LD; ISUOG-WHO Fetal Growth Study Group. Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 599-608.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Torloni M.R., Vedmedovska N., Merialdi M., Betran A.P., Allen T., Gonzalez R., Platt LD; ISUOG-WHO Fetal Growth Study Group. Safety of ultrasonography in pregnancy: WHO systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 599-608.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hershkovitz R., Sheiner E., Mazor M. Ultrasound in obstetrics: a review of safety. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 101: 15-18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hershkovitz R., Sheiner E., Mazor M. Ultrasound in obstetrics: a review of safety. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002; 101: 15-18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salvesen K., Lees C., Abramowicz J., Brezinka C., Ter Haar G., Marsal K. ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13+6-week fetal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 628.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salvesen K., Lees C., Abramowicz J., Brezinka C., Ter Haar G., Marsal K. ISUOG statement on the safe use of Doppler in the 11 to 13+6-week fetal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 628.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewi L., Jani J., Blickstein I., Huber A., Gucciardo L., Van Mieghem T., Done E., Boes A.S., Hecher K., Gratacos E., Lewi P., Deprest J. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 493.e1-7.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewi L., Jani J., Blickstein I., Huber A., Gucciardo L., Van Mieghem T., Done E., Boes A.S., Hecher K., Gratacos E., Lewi P., Deprest J. The outcome of monochorionic diamniotic twin gestations in the era of invasive fetal therapy: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 493.e1-7.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dias T., Arcangeli T., Bhide A., Napolitano R., Mahsud-Dornan S., Thilaganathan B. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 530-532.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dias T., Arcangeli T., Bhide A., Napolitano R., Mahsud-Dornan S., Thilaganathan B. First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 38: 530-532.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fong K.W., Toi A., Salem S., Hornberger L.K., Chitayat D., Keating S.J., McAuliffe F., Johnson J.A. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities with US during early pregnancy. Radiographics 2004; 24: 157-174.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fong K.W., Toi A., Salem S., Hornberger L.K., Chitayat D., Keating S.J., McAuliffe F., Johnson J.A. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities with US during early pregnancy. Radiographics 2004; 24: 157-174.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jurkovic D., Gruboeck K., Campbell S. Ultrasound features of normal early pregnancy development. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1995; 7: 493-504.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jurkovic D., Gruboeck K., Campbell S. Ultrasound features of normal early pregnancy development. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1995; 7: 493-504.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tezuka N., Sato S., Kanasugi H., Hiroi M. Embryonic heart rates: development in early first trimester and clinical evaluation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1991; 32:210-212.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tezuka N., Sato S., Kanasugi H., Hiroi M. Embryonic heart rates: development in early first trimester and clinical evaluation. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1991; 32:210-212.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Levi C.S., Lyons E.A., Zheng X.H., Lindsay D.J., Holt S.C. Endovaginal US: demonstration of cardiac activity in embryos of less than 5.0 mm in crown-rump length. Radiology 1990; 176: 71-74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Levi C.S., Lyons E.A., Zheng X.H., Lindsay D.J., Holt S.C. Endovaginal US: demonstration of cardiac activity in embryos of less than 5.0 mm in crown-rump length. Radiology 1990; 176: 71-74.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goldstein Sr. Significance of cardiac activity on endovaginal ultrasound in very early embryos. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 670-672.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goldstein Sr. Significance of cardiac activity on endovaginal ultrasound in very early embryos. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 80: 670-672.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown D.L., Emerson D.S., Felker R.E., Cartier M.S., Smith W.C. Diagnosis of early embryonic demise by endovaginal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9: 631-636.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown D.L., Emerson D.S., Felker R.E., Cartier M.S., Smith W.C. Diagnosis of early embryonic demise by endovaginal sonography. J Ultrasound Med 1990; 9: 631-636.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oh J.S., Wright G., Coulam C.B. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 267-269.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oh J.S., Wright G., Coulam C.B. Gestational sac diameter in very early pregnancy as a predictor of fetal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 267-269.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson H.P., Sweet E.M., Adam A.H. The accuracy of radiological estimates of gestational age using early fetal crown-rump length measurements by ultrasound as a basis for comparison. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86: 525-528.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson H.P., Sweet E.M., Adam A.H. The accuracy of radiological estimates of gestational age using early fetal crown-rump length measurements by ultrasound as a basis for comparison. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1979; 86: 525-528.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson H.P.. ‘‘Gestation sac’’ volumes as determined by sonar in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 100-107.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson H.P.. ‘‘Gestation sac’’ volumes as determined by sonar in the first trimester of pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 100-107.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salomon L.J., Bernard M., Amarsy R., Bernard J.P., Ville Y. The impact of crown-rump length measurement error on combined Down syndrome screening: a simulation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 506-511.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salomon L.J., Bernard M., Amarsy R., Bernard J.P., Ville Y. The impact of crown-rump length measurement error on combined Down syndrome screening: a simulation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 506-511.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sladkevicius P., Saltvedt S., Almstrom H., Kublickas M., Grunewald C., Valentin L. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 504-511.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sladkevicius P., Saltvedt S., Almstrom H., Kublickas M., Grunewald C., Valentin L. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005; 26: 504-511.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Altman D.G., Chitty L.S. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10: 174-191.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Altman D.G., Chitty L.S. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10: 174-191.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salomon L.J., Bernard J.P., Duyme M., Dorion A., Ville Y. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 63-66.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salomon L.J., Bernard J.P., Duyme M., Dorion A., Ville Y. Revisiting first-trimester fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22: 63-66.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loughna P., Chitty L., Evans T., Chudleigh T. Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound 2009; 17: 161-167.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Loughna P., Chitty L., Evans T., Chudleigh T. Fetal size and dating: charts recommended for clinical obstetric practice. Ultrasound 2009; 17: 161-167.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hadlock F.P., Deter R.L., Carpenter R.J., Park S.K. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 83-85.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hadlock F.P., Deter R.L., Carpenter R.J., Park S.K. Estimating fetal age: effect of head shape on BPD. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981; 137: 83-85.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Verburg B.O., Steegers E.A.P., De Ridder M., Snijders R.J.M., Smith E., Hofman A., Moll H.A., Jaddoe V.W., Witteman J.C. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 388-396.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Verburg B.O., Steegers E.A.P., De Ridder M., Snijders R.J.M., Smith E., Hofman A., Moll H.A., Jaddoe V.W., Witteman J.C. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 388-396.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000170.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Crowley P. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000170.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mongelli M., Wong Y.C., Venkat A., Chua T.M. Induction policy and missed post-term pregnancies: a mathematical model. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41: 38-40.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mongelli M., Wong Y.C., Venkat A., Chua T.M. Induction policy and missed post-term pregnancies: a mathematical model. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41: 38-40.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hoffman C.S., Messer L.C., Mendola P., Savitz D.A., Herring A.H., Hartmann K.E. Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008; 22: 587-596.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hoffman C.S., Messer L.C., Mendola P., Savitz D.A., Herring A.H., Hartmann K.E. Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2008; 22: 587-596.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">NICE. Antenatal care: Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: London, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">NICE. Antenatal care: Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: London, 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Savitz D.A., Terry J.W., Dole N., Thorp J.M., Siega-Riz A.M., Herring A.H. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1660-1666.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Savitz D.A., Terry J.W., Dole N., Thorp J.M., Siega-Riz A.M., Herring A.H. Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1660-1666.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bagratee J.S., Regan L., Khullar V., Connolly C., Moodley J. Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac and embryo volumes using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 503-509.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bagratee J.S., Regan L., Khullar V., Connolly C., Moodley J. Reference intervals of gestational sac, yolk sac and embryo volumes using three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34: 503-509.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grisolia G., Milano K., Pilu G., Banzi C., David C., Gabrielli S., Rizzo N., Morandi R., Bovicelli L. Biometry of early pregnancy with transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 403-411.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grisolia G., Milano K., Pilu G., Banzi C., David C., Gabrielli S., Rizzo N., Morandi R., Bovicelli L. Biometry of early pregnancy with transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 403-411.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson H.P.. Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J 1973; 4: 28-31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson H.P.. Sonar measurement of fetal crown-rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy. Br Med J 1973; 4: 28-31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson H.P., Fleming J.E. A critical evaluation of sonar ‘‘crown-rump length’’ measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 702-710.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson H.P., Fleming J.E. A critical evaluation of sonar ‘‘crown-rump length’’ measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 702-710.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dias T., Mahsud-Dornan S., Thilaganathan B., Papageorghiou A., Bhide A. First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable? BJOG 2010; 117: 979-984.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dias T., Mahsud-Dornan S., Thilaganathan B., Papageorghiou A., Bhide A. First-trimester ultrasound dating of twin pregnancy: are singleton charts reliable? BJOG 2010; 117: 979-984.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Saltvedt S., Almstrom H., Kublickas M., Valentin L., Grunewald C. Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation - a randomized controlled trial in 39,572 pregnancies. BJOG 2006; 113: 664-674.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Saltvedt S., Almstrom H., Kublickas M., Valentin L., Grunewald C. Detection of malformations in chromosomally normal fetuses by routine ultrasound at 12 or 18 weeks of gestation - a randomized controlled trial in 39,572 pregnancies. BJOG 2006; 113: 664-674.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen M., Lee C.P., Lam Y.H., Tang R.Y.K., Chan B.C.P., Wong S.F., Tse L.H., Tang M.H. Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 136-146; discussion 146.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen M., Lee C.P., Lam Y.H., Tang R.Y.K., Chan B.C.P., Wong S.F., Tse L.H., Tang M.H. Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 136-146; discussion 146.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Fuchs K.M., Monteagudo A., D’Alton M.E. Performing a fetal anatomy scan at the time of first-trimester screening. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 402-407.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Fuchs K.M., Monteagudo A., D’Alton M.E. Performing a fetal anatomy scan at the time of first-trimester screening. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 402-407.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit57"><label>57</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Abu-Rustum R.S., Daou L., Abu-Rustum S.E. Role of first trimester sonography in the diagnosis of aneuploidy and structural fetal anomalies. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:1445-1452.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abu-Rustum R.S., Daou L., Abu-Rustum S.E. Role of first trimester sonography in the diagnosis of aneuploidy and structural fetal anomalies. J Ultrasound Med 2010;29:1445-1452.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit58"><label>58</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Bashiri A., Monteagudo A., Arslan A.A. Qualified and trained sonographers in the US can perform early fetal anatomy scans between 11 and 14 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1247-1252.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Bashiri A., Monteagudo A., Arslan A.A. Qualified and trained sonographers in the US can perform early fetal anatomy scans between 11 and 14 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1247-1252.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit59"><label>59</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bronshtein M., Zimmer E.Z. Transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal clubfeet at 13 weeks, menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound. 1989; 17: 518-520.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bronshtein M., Zimmer E.Z. Transvaginal ultrasound diagnosis of fetal clubfeet at 13 weeks, menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound. 1989; 17: 518-520.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit60"><label>60</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taipale P., Ammala M., Salonen R., Hiilesmaa V. Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 273-278.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taipale P., Ammala M., Salonen R., Hiilesmaa V. Learning curve in ultrasonographic screening for selected fetal structural anomalies in early pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 273-278.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit61"><label>61</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cedergren M., Selbing A. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by an 11-14-week ultrasound dating scan in an unselected Swedish population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 912-915.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cedergren M., Selbing A. Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by an 11-14-week ultrasound dating scan in an unselected Swedish population. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 912-915.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit62"><label>62</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fisher J. First-trimester screening: dealing with the fall-out. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 46-49.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fisher J. First-trimester screening: dealing with the fall-out. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 46-49.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit63"><label>63</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chaoui R., Nicolaides K.H. From nuchal translucency to intracranial translucency: towards the early detection of spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 133-138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chaoui R., Nicolaides K.H. From nuchal translucency to intracranial translucency: towards the early detection of spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 133-138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit64"><label>64</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sepulveda W., Wong A.E., Martinez-Ten P., Perez-Pedregosa J. Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 7-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sepulveda W., Wong A.E., Martinez-Ten P., Perez-Pedregosa J. Retronasal triangle: a sonographic landmark for the screening of cleft palate in the first trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35: 7-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit65"><label>65</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Syngelaki A., Chelemen T., Dagklis T., Allan L., Nicolaides K.H. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 90-102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Syngelaki A., Chelemen T., Dagklis T., Allan L., Nicolaides K.H. Challenges in the diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities at 11-13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 90-102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit66"><label>66</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bernard J.-P., Cuckle H.S., Stirnemann J.J., Salomon L.J., Ville Y. Screening for fetal spina bifida by ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy using fetal biparietal diameter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 306.e1-5.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bernard J.-P., Cuckle H.S., Stirnemann J.J., Salomon L.J., Ville Y. Screening for fetal spina bifida by ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy using fetal biparietal diameter. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 306.e1-5.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit67"><label>67</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeVore G.R. First-trimester fetal echocardiography: is the future now? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 6-8.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeVore G.R. First-trimester fetal echocardiography: is the future now? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 6-8.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit68"><label>68</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yagel S., Cohen S.M., Messing B. First and early second trimester fetal heart screening. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 183-190.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yagel S., Cohen S.M., Messing B. First and early second trimester fetal heart screening. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 183-190.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit69"><label>69</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Zalen-Sprock R.M., Vugt J.M., van Geijn H.P. First-trimester sonography of physiological midgut herniation and early diagnosisof omphalocele. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 511-518.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Zalen-Sprock R.M., Vugt J.M., van Geijn H.P. First-trimester sonography of physiological midgut herniation and early diagnosisof omphalocele. Prenat Diagn 1997; 17: 511-518.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit70"><label>70</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bhaduri M., Fong K., Toi A., Tomlinson G., Okun N. Fetal anatomic survey using three-dimensional ultrasound in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30:267-273.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bhaduri M., Fong K., Toi A., Tomlinson G., Okun N. Fetal anatomic survey using three-dimensional ultrasound in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening. Prenat Diagn 2010; 30:267-273.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit71"><label>71</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nicolaides K.H., Azar G., Byrne D., Mansur C., Marks K. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ 1992; 304: 867-869.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nicolaides K.H., Azar G., Byrne D., Mansur C., Marks K. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ 1992; 304: 867-869.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit72"><label>72</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nicolaides K.H., Snijders R.J., Gosden C.M., Berry C., Campbell S. Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Lancet 1992; 340: 704-707.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nicolaides K.H., Snijders R.J., Gosden C.M., Berry C., Campbell S. Ultrasonographically detectable markers of fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Lancet 1992; 340: 704-707.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit73"><label>73</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kagan K.O., Wright D., Baker A., Sahota D., Nicolaides K.H. Screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, free beta- human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 618-624.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kagan K.O., Wright D., Baker A., Sahota D., Nicolaides K.H. Screening for trisomy 21 by maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, free beta- human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 618-624.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit74"><label>74</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kagan K.O., Cicero S., Staboulidou I., Wright D., Nicolaides K.H. Fetal nasal bone in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11-13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 259-264.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kagan K.O., Cicero S., Staboulidou I., Wright D., Nicolaides K.H. Fetal nasal bone in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11-13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 259-264.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit75"><label>75</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kagan K.O., Valencia C., Livanos P., Wright D., Nicolaides K.H. Tricuspid regurgitation in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 18-22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kagan K.O., Valencia C., Livanos P., Wright D., Nicolaides K.H. Tricuspid regurgitation in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 18-22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit76"><label>76</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Maiz N., Valencia C., Kagan K.O., Wright D., Nicolaides K.H. Ductus venosus Doppler in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11-13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 512-517.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Maiz N., Valencia C., Kagan K.O., Wright D., Nicolaides K.H. Ductus venosus Doppler in screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and Turner syndrome at 11-13 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 512-517.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit77"><label>77</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nicolaides K.H. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 7-15.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nicolaides K.H. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 7-15.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit78"><label>78</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mustafa S.A., Brizot M.L., Carvalho M.H.B., Watanabe L., Kahhale S., Zugaib M. Transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting placenta previa at delivery: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 356-359.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mustafa S.A., Brizot M.L., Carvalho M.H.B., Watanabe L., Kahhale S., Zugaib M. Transvaginal ultrasonography in predicting placenta previa at delivery: a longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002; 20: 356-359.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit79"><label>79</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A., Santos R., Tsymbal T., Pineda G., Arslan A.A. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 44.e1-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A., Santos R., Tsymbal T., Pineda G., Arslan A.A. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 44.e1-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit80"><label>80</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 14-29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Timor-Tritsch I.E., Monteagudo A. Unforeseen consequences of the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries: early placenta accreta and cesarean scar pregnancy. A review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 14-29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit81"><label>81</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stirnemann J.J., Chalouhi G.E., Forner S., Saidji Y., Salomon L.J., Bernard J.-P., Ville Y. First-trimester uterine scar assessment by transvaginal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 551.e1-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stirnemann J.J., Chalouhi G.E., Forner S., Saidji Y., Salomon L.J., Bernard J.-P., Ville Y. First-trimester uterine scar assessment by transvaginal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 551.e1-6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit82"><label>82</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stirnemann J.J., Mousty E., Chalouhi G., Salomon L.J., Bernard J.-P., Ville Y. Screening for placenta accreta at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 547. e1-6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stirnemann J.J., Mousty E., Chalouhi G., Salomon L.J., Bernard J.-P., Ville Y. Screening for placenta accreta at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 547. e1-6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit83"><label>83</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hadlock F.P., Shah Y.P., Kanon D.J., Lindsey J.V. Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology 1992; 182: 501-505.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hadlock F.P., Shah Y.P., Kanon D.J., Lindsey J.V. Fetal crown-rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5-18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US. Radiology 1992; 182: 501-505.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit84"><label>84</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Daya S. Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 903-908.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Daya S. Accuracy of gestational age estimation by means of fetal crown-rump length measurement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168: 903-908.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit85"><label>85</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McLennan A.C., Schluter P.J. Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008;52:471-479.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McLennan A.C., Schluter P.J. Construction of modern Australian first trimester ultrasound dating and growth charts. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2008;52:471-479.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit86"><label>86</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hadlock F.P., Deter R.L., Harrist R.B., Park S.K. Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1982; 1: 97-104.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hadlock F.P., Deter R.L., Harrist R.B., Park S.K. Fetal biparietal diameter: a critical re-evaluation of the relation to menstrual age by means of real-time ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 1982; 1: 97-104.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit87"><label>87</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McAuliffe F.M., Fong K.W., Toi A., Chitayat D., Keating S., Johnson J.-A. Ultrasound detection of fetal anomalies in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening: a feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1260-1265.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McAuliffe F.M., Fong K.W., Toi A., Chitayat D., Keating S., Johnson J.-A. Ultrasound detection of fetal anomalies in conjunction with first-trimester nuchal translucency screening: a feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 1260-1265.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit88"><label>88</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Von Kaisenberg C.S., Kuhling-von Kaisenberg H., Fritzer E., Schemm S., Meinhold-Heerlein I., Jonat W. Fetal transabdominal anatomy scanning using standard views at 11 to 14 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 535-542.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Von Kaisenberg C.S., Kuhling-von Kaisenberg H., Fritzer E., Schemm S., Meinhold-Heerlein I., Jonat W. Fetal transabdominal anatomy scanning using standard views at 11 to 14 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 535-542.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
