Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of the Kidney Neoplasms: Case Report
Abstract
Clinical case of 19 years old patient with papillary renal cell carcinoma, Fuhrman grade 2, with intratumoral necrosis is presented. Computed tomography was not performed due to the allergic reaction of the patient. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (SonoVue, Bracco) was done. Tumour did not show typical pattern due to the necrosis. It does not allow making a conclusion about presence of a malignant tumor. However, insignificant intake of ultrasound contrast agent in a cavity of cystic tumor and a fragmentary contrast enhancement in arterial phase of the tumor’s capsule were underestimated.
Keywords
ультразвуковое исследование с контрастным усилением,
ультразвуковой контрастный препарат,
Соновью,
артериальная фаза,
папиллярный почечно-клеточный рак,
некроз,
contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS),
ultrasound contrast agent (UCA),
SonoVue,
arterial phase,
papillary renal cell carcinoma,
necrosis
About the Authors
Yu. A. Stepanova
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
O. A. Chekhoeva
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. V. Kalinin
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Teplov
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Gritskevich
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. S. Pyanikin
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N. A. Karelskaya
A.V. Vishnevsky Institute of Surgery
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2003 г. / Под ред. В.И. Чиссова, В.В. Старинского, Г.В. Петровой. М., 2005. 289 с.
2. Аляев Ю.Г., Крапивин A.A., Григорьев H.A. и др. Особенности диагностики новообразования почки до 4 см // Медицинская визуализация. 2003. № 2. С.33-38.
3. Ljungberg B., Bensalah K., Bex A. et al. Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma // European Association of Urology. 2015. 58 p. Режим доступа: // http:// uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines- Renal-Cell-Cancer-2015-v2.pdf, свободный. Загл. с экрана. 20.01.2016.
4. Кармазановский Г.Г., Степанова Ю.А., Аскерова Н.Н. История развития контрастного усиления при ультразвуковом исследовании // Медицинская визуализация. 2015. № 2. С. 110-119.
5. Piscaglia F., Nolsoe C., Dietrich C.F. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications // Ultraschall Med. 2012. V. 33. No. 1. P. 33-59.
6. Li C.X., Lu Q., Huang B.J. et al. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in detecting minute renal cell carcinoma // Discov. Med. 2014. V. 18. No. 99. P. 179-188.
7. Chen L., Wang L., Diao X. et al. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating small renal carcinoma and angiomyolipoma // Biosci. Trends. 2015. V. 9. No. 4. P. 252-258.
Review
For citations:
Stepanova Yu.A., Chekhoeva O.A., Kalinin D.V., Teplov A.A., Gritskevich A.A., Pyanikin S.S., Karelskaya N.A. Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of the Kidney Neoplasms: Case Report. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2016;(3):98-103. (In Russ.)
Views:
98
Email this article 