Ультразвуковая диагностика добавочного полостного внутриматочного образования: клинические наблюдения и обзор литературы
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-276
Аннотация
Цель исследования: обзор литературы и собственного опыта диагностики аномалии развития мюллерова протока ACUM (accessory cavitated uterine mass) – добавочного полостного внутриматочного образования. Отсутствие единых данных относительно названия, классификации, методов диагностики и лечения делает данную аномалию актуальной для мультидисциплинарного изучения.
Об авторах
И. А. Есипова
ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
Есипова Ирина Андреевна – канд. мед. наук, доцент кафедры акушерства и гинекологии им. академика Г.М. Савельевой педиатрического факультета ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава России, Москва.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2130-5431
М. Н. Буланов
ГБУЗ Владимирской области “Областная клиническая больница”;
ФГБОУ ВПО “Новгородский государственный университет имени Ярослава Мудрого”
Россия
Россия
Буланов Михаил Николаевич – доктор мед. наук, заведующий отделением ультразвуковой диагностики ГБУЗ ВО “Областная клиническая больница”, Владимир; профессор кафедры внутренних болезней Института медицинского образования ФГБОУ ВО “Новгородский государственный университет имени Ярослава Мудрого”, Великий Новгород.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-768X
И. А. Краснова
ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
Краснова Ирина Алексеевна – доктор мед. наук, профессор, профессор кафедры акушерства и гинекологии им. академика Г.М. Савельевой педиатрического факультета ФГАОУ ВО РНИМУ им. Н.И. Пирогова Минздрава России, Москва.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6765-4127
Список литературы
1. Acién P., Acién M., Fernández F. et al. The cavitated accessory uterine mass: a Müllerian anomaly in women with an otherwise normal uterus. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 116 (5):1101–1109. http://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f7e735
2. Acién P., Acién M. The presentation and management of complex female genital malformations. Human Reprod. Update. 2016; 22 (1): 48–69. http://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv048
3. Timmerman S., Stubbe L., Bosch T. et al. Accessory cavitated uterine malformation (ACUM): A scoping review. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2024; 103 (6): 1036–1045. http://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14801
4. Mondal R., Bhave P. Accessory cavitated uterine malformation: Enhancing awareness about this unexplored perpetrator of dysmenorrhea. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023; 162 (2): 409–432. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14681
5. Strug M., Christmas A., Schoonover A. et al. Impact of an accessory cavitated uterine mass on fertility: case presentation and review of the literature. F&S Reports. 2023; 4 (4): 402–409. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2023.09.001
6. Bazot M., Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2018; 109 (3): 389–397. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.024
7. Merviel P., Lelievre C., Cambier T. et al. The first ethanol sclerotherapy of an accessory cavitated uterine mass. Clin. Case Rep. 2020; 9 (1): 19–22. http://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.3371
8. Grimbizis G., Gordts S., Sardo A. et al. The ESHRE-ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Gynecol. Surg. 2013; 10 (3): 199–212. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-013-0800-x
9. Pfeifer S., Attaran M., Goldstein J. et al. ASRM müllerian anomalies classification 2021. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 116 (5): 1238–1252. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.025
10. Acién P., Acién M. Accessory and cavitated uterine mass versus juvenile cystic adenomyoma. F&S Reports. 2021; 2 (3): 357–358. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2021.06.006
11. Naftalin J., Bean E., Saridogan E. et al. Imaging in gynecological disease (21): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of accessory cavitated uterine malformations. Ultrasound Obstetet. Gynecol. 2021; 57 (5): 821–828. http://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22173
12. Takeuchi H., Kitade M., Kikuchi I. et al. Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94 (3): 862–868. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.010
13. Rackow B. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: a new müllerian anomaly? Fertil. Steril. 2022; 117 (3): 649–650. http://doi.org/1011.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.006
14. Acién P., Bataller A., Fernández F. et al. New cases of accessory and cavitated uterine masses (ACUM): a significant cause of severe dysmenorrhea and recurrent pelvic pain in young women. Hum. Reprod. 2012; 27 (3): 683–694. http://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der471
15. Dekkiche S., Dubruc E., Kanbar M. et al. Accessory and cavitated uterine masses: a case series and review of the literature. Front. Reprod. Health. 2023; 5: 1197931. http://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1197931
16. Takeuchi H., Kitade M., Kikuchi I. et al. Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94 (3): 862–868. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.010
17. Arya S., Burks H. Juvenile cystic adenomyoma, a rare diagnostic challenge: Case Reports and literature review. F&S Reports. 2021; 2 (2): 166–171. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2021.02.002
18. Mondal R., Bhave P. Accessory cavitated uterine malformation: Enhancing awareness about this unexplored perpetrator of dysmenorrhea. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023; 162 (2): 409–432. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14681
19. Macer M., Taylor H. Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2012; 39 (4): 535-549. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2012.10.002
20. Ahmed A., Swan R., Owen A. et al. Uterus-like mass arising in the broad ligament: a metaplasia or mullerian duct anomaly? Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1997; 16 (3): 279–281. http://doi.org/10.1097/00004347-199707000-00015
21. Tokgoz V., Tekin A. A rare case of the new entity of müllerian anomalies mimicking the noncommunicating rudimentary cavity with hemi-uterus: accessory cavitated uterine mass. Fertil. Steril. 2022; 117 (3): 646–648. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.11.028
22. Nishiuchi K., Uotani K., Kobayashi D. et al. Uterine diverticulum mimicking endometriotic cyst of the ovary. Radiol. Case Rep. 2023; 19 (3): 934–938. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.11.023
23. Stockwell E. Decidualized juvenile cystic adenomyoma mimicking a cornual heterotopic pregnancy. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28 (11): 6726. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.09.121
24. Dekkiche S., Dubruc E., Kanbar M. et al. Accessory and cavitated uterine masses: a case series and review of the literature. Front. Reprod. Health. 2023; 5: 1197931. http://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2023.1197931
25. Peyron N., Jacquemier E., Charlot M. et al. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: MRI features and surgical correlations of a rare but under-recognised entity. Eur. Radiol. 2019; 29 (3): 1144–1152. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5686-6
26. Mollion M., Host A., Faller E. et al. Report of two cases of Accessory Cavitated Uterine Mass (ACUM): Diagnostic challenge for MRI. Radiol. Case Rep. 2021; 16 (11): 3465–3469. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2021.07.071
27. Rackow B. Accessory cavitated uterine mass: a new müllerian anomaly? Fertil. Steril. 2022; 117 (3): 649–650. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.006
28. Peters A., Rindos N., Guido R., Donnellan N. Uterine-sparing Laparoscopic Resection of Accessory Cavitated Uterine Masses. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25 (1): 24–25. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.001
29. Strelec M., Banović M., Banović V., Sirovec A. Juvenile cystic adenomyoma mimicking a Mullerian uterine anomaly successfully treated by laparoscopic excision. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2019; 146 (2): 265–266. http://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12880
30. Park J., Kim D. Successful laparoscopic surgery of accessory cavitated uterine mass in young women with severe dysmenorrhea. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med. 2021; 38 (3): 235–239. http://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2020.00696
31. Protopapas A., Kypriotis K., Chatzipapas I. et al. Juvenile Cystic Adenomyoma vs Blind Uterine Horn: Challenges in the Diagnosis and Surgical Management. J. Pediatr. Adolesc. Gynecol. 2020; 33 (6): 735–738. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2020.08.010
32. Bakshi N., Dhawan S. Extrapelvic "Uterus Like Mass" Following Laparoscopic Morcellation Hysterectomy – a Consequence of Iatrogenic Implantation? Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2023; 31 (5): 791–794. http://doi.org/10.1177/10668969221133350
33. Supermaniam S., Thye W. Diagnosis and laparoscopic excision of accessory cavitated uterine mass in young women: Two case reports. Case Rep. Womens Health. 2020; 26: e00187. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00187
34. Strug M., Christmas A., Schoonover A. et al. Impact of an accessory cavitated uterine mass on fertility: case presentation and review of the literature. F&S Reports. 2023; 4 (4): 402–409. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2023.09.001
35. Hu Y., Wang A., Chen J. Diagnosis and laparoscopic excision of accessory cavitated uterine mass in a young woman: A case report. Wld J. Clin. Cases. 2021; 9 (30): 9122–9128. http://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i30.9122
36. Bakshi N., Dhawan S. Extrapelvic “Uterus Like Mass” Following Laparoscopic Morcellation Hysterectomy – a Consequence of Iatrogenic Implantation? Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2023; 31 (5): 791–794. http://doi.org/10.1177/10668969221133350
Дополнительные файлы
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Есипова И.А., Буланов М.Н., Краснова И.А. Ультразвуковая диагностика добавочного полостного внутриматочного образования: клинические наблюдения и обзор литературы. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2024;(4):53-63. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-276
For citation:
Esipova I.A., Bulanov M.N., Krasnova I.A. Ultrasound of accessory and cavitated uterine mass (ACUM): clinical cases and literature review. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2024;(4):53-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-276
Просмотров:
1348
Послать статью по эл. почте 