Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of kidney allograft in patient with acute rejection. Case report and literature review

Kidney transplantation is recognized as the optimal modality of renal replacement therapy. In most cases the diagnosis of the causes of kidney allograft dysfunction and subsequent choice of treatment strategy are determined by the results of nephrobiopsy. The search for alternative noninvasive diagnostic modalities, including ultrasound, that could reveal the specific features of the most common causes of renal graft dysfunction remains relevant. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)is considered a promising modality for the diagnosis of renal graft dysfunction in general and of acute rejection in particular.

The article presents the analysis of the results of multiparametric ultrasound in a patient with acute antibody-mediated rejection after voluntary complete withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy. The subcapsular areas of hypoperfusion were found along with a decrease of allograft perfusion in general. The patterns of “slow wash-in – fast wash-out” of contrast medium in the medulla and “fast wash-out” in the cortex were also detected. The comparison of CEUS and histopathological data from the removed allograft identified the foci of cortical necrosis as the substrate of abnormal perfusion areas. Now it seems premature to evaluate the diagnostic capability of CEUS in complex ultrasound of renal allograft. Further research is necessary to determine the role of CEUS in the complex assessment of kidney transplant pathology.

1. Kaballo M.A., Canney M., O'Kelly P. et al. A comparative analysis of survival of patients on dialysis and after kidney transplantation. Clin. Kidney J. 2018; 11: 389–393. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfx117

2. Lentine K.L., Smith J.M., Hart A. et al. OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am. J. Transplant. 2022; 22, Suppl. 2: 21–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16982

3. Loupy A., Vernerey D., Tinel C. et al. Subclinical Rejection Phenotypes at 1 Year Post-Transplant and Outcome of Kidney Allografts. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015; 26 (7): 1721–1731. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2014040399

4. Pinchuk A.V., Shmarina N.V., Dmitriev I.V. et al. The impact of early acute rejection on kidney graft survival after repeat kidney transplantation. Transplantologiya. The Russian Journal of Transplantation. 2021; 13 (3): 260–271. https://doi.org/10.23873/2074-0506-2021-13-3-260-271 (In Russian)

5. Meier-Kriesche H.U., Schold J.D., Srinivas T.R., Kaplan B. Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am. J. Transplant. 2004; 4 (3): 378–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00332.x

6. Friedl S., Jung E.M., Bergler T. et al. Factors influencing the time-intensity curve analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in kidney transplanted patients: Toward a standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination. Front. Med. (Lausanne). 2022; 9: 928567. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.928567

7. Yalçin-Şafak K., Ayyildiz M., Ünel S.Y. et al. The relationship of ADC values of renal parenchyma with CKD stage and serum creatinine levels. Eur. J. Radiol. Open. 2015; 3: 8–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2015.10.002

8. Granata A., Di Nicolò P., Scarfia V.R. et al. Renal transplantation parenchymal complications: what Doppler ultrasound can and cannot do. J. Ultrasound. 2014; 18 (2): 109–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0118-1

9. Morgan T.A., Jha P., Poder L., Weinstein S. Advanced ultrasound applications in the assessment of renal transplants: contrast-enhanced ultrasound, elastography, and B-flow. Abdom. Radiol. (NY). 2018; 43 (10): 2604–2614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1585-1

10. Radermacher J., Mengel M., Ellis S. et al. The renal arterial resistance index and renal allograft survival. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 3 49 (2): 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022602

11. Naesens M., Heylen L., Lerut E. et al. Intrarenal resistive index after renal transplantation. N Engl. J. Med. 2013; 369 (19): 1797–1806. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301064

12. Martinoli C., Bertolotto M., Crespi G. et al. Duplex Doppler analysis of interlobular arteries in transplanted kidneys. Eur. Radiol. 1998; 8 (5): 765–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050469

13. Chudek J., Kolonko A., Król R. et al. The intrarenal vascular resistance parameters measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound shortly after kidney transplantation in patients with immediate, slow, and delayed graft function. Transplant. Proc. 2006; 38 (1): 42–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.12.013

14. Pykov M.I., Ektov D.B. Changes in Hemodynamic Parameters in Various Morphological Changes in the Kidney Transplant in Children. Radiology–Practice. 2021; (4): 76–87. https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2021-4-76-87 (In Russian)

15. Stolyarevich E.S., Zhilinskaya T.R., Artyukhina L.Yu. et al. Morphological structure of late renal graft dysfunction and its effect for long-term results. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2018; 20 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2018-1-45-54 (In Russian)

16. Martinoli C., Crespi G., Bertolotto M. et al. Interlobular vasculature in renal transplants: a power Doppler US study with MR correlation. Radiology. 1996; 200 (1): 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.1.8657897

17. Martinoli C., Bertolotto M., Pretolesi F. et al. Kidney: normal anatomy. Eur. Radiol. 1999; 9 Suppl. 3: S389-393. doi: 10.1007/pl00014081

18. Belavina N.I., Trushkin R.N., Artyukhina L.Yu. et al. Ultrasound examination of failed renal transplant in patients with graft intolerance syndrome. Case series. Nephrology and dialysis. 2023; 25 (3): 401–412. https://doi.org/10.28996/2618-9801-2023-3-401-412 (In Russian)

19. Bertolotto M., Quaia E., Galli G. et al. Color Doppler sonographic appearance of renal perforating vessels in subjects with normal and impaired renal function. J Clin Ultrasound. 2000; 28(6): 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0096(200007/08)28:6<267::aid-jcu1>3.0.co;2-p

20. Shebel H.M., Akl A., Dawood A. et al. Power doppler sonography in early renal transplantation: does it differentiate acute graft rejection from acute tubular necrosis? Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2014; 25 (4):733–40. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.134948

21. Wang H.K., Chou Y.H., Yang A.H. et al. Evaluation of cortical perfusion in renal transplants: application of quantified power Doppler ultrasonography. Transplant. Proc. 2008; 40 (7): 2330–2332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.06.046

22. Sencha A.N. (ed.). Ultrasound examination using contrast agents. From simple to complex. Moscow: MEDpress-inform, 2021. 296 p. ISBN 978-5-00030-862-2 (In Russian)

23. Sidhu P.S., Cantisani V., Dietrich C.F. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for the Clinical Practice of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Non-Hepatic Applications: Update 2017 (Long Version). Ultraschall Med. 2018; 39 (2): e2–e44. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0586-1107

24. Mueller-Peltzer K., Negrão de Figueiredo G., Fischereder M. et al. Vascular rejection in renal transplant: Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) compared to biopsy. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2018; 69 (1–2): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-189115

25. Rinaldo C., Grimaldi D., Di Serafino M. et al. An update on pyelonephritis: role of contrast enhancement ultrasound (CEUS). J. Ultrasound. 2023; 26 (2): 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00733-9

26. Benozzi L., Cappelli G., Granito M. et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography in early kidney graft dysfunction. Transplant. Proc. 2009; 41 (4): 1214–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.03.029