Transrectal ultrasound of prostatectomy bed
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2021-3-10-36
Abstract
Currently, a radical prostatectomy is performed in one third of patients with localized prostate cancer, which requires the standardization of protocol and report of the ultrasound examination with regard to time necessary to provide a quality diagnostic evaluation. A detailed description of the ultrasound signs and image storage significantly assist the dynamic assessment of the prostatectomy bed, and helps to avoid a false-positive diagnosis of local recurrence of prostate cancer. When interpreting transrectal ultrasound signs of prostatectomy bed pathology, it is necessary to take into account not only the results of ultrasound examination, ultrasound follow-up, but also clinical and laboratory data (at least, the presence or absence of biochemical recurrence). If necessary, the transrectal ultrasound of the prostatectomy bed can be used for targeting a suspicious lesion including MRI/US fusion biopsy.
About the Authors
V. V. Kapustin
Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; Moscow City Oncology Hospital No. 62
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. D. Mitkova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. EAU - EANM - ESTRO - ESUR - ISUP - SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer. 2021. https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-EANMESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG-Guidelines-on-Prostate-Cancer-2021V4.pdf (дата обращения 25.06.2021)
2. Клинические рекомендации “Рак предстательной железы”. 2021. https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/12_3 (дата обращения 25.06.2021)
3. Artibani W., Porcaro A.B., De Marco V., Cerruto M.A., Siracusano S. Management of biochemical recurrence after primary curative treatment for prostate cancer: a review. Urol. Int. 2018; 100 (3): 251-262. https://doi.org/10.1159/000481438
4. Bhargava P., Ravizzini G., Chapin B.F., Kundra V. Imaging biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: where are we headed? AJR. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2020; 214 (6): 1248-1258. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.19.21905
5. Magnetta M.J., Casalino D., Heller M.T. Imaging assessment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Abdom. Radiol. (NY). 2020; 45 (12): 4073-4083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02505-7
6. Expert Panel on Urologic Imaging; Froemming A.T., Verma S., Eberhardt S.C., Oto A., Alexander L.F., Allen B.C., Coakley F.V., Davis B.J., Fulgham P.F., Hosseinzadeh K., Porter C., Sahni V.A., Schuster D.M., Showalter T.N., Venkatesan A.M., Wang C.L., Remer E.M. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-treatment follow-up prostate cancer. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2018; 15 (5S): S132-S149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.019
7. AIUM Practice parameter for the performance of ultrasound evaluations of the prostate (and surrounding structures). J. Ultrasound Med. 2021; 40 (5): E25-E29. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15666
8. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения РФ от 13 октября 2017 г. № 804н “Об утверждении номенклатуры медицинских услуг” (с изменениями и дополнениями от 16 апреля 2019 г., 5 марта, 24 сентября 2020 г.). http://base.garant.ru/71805302/ (дата обращения 03.03.2021)
9. Федеральный справочник инструментальных диагностических исследований. https://nsi.rosminzdrav.ru/#!/refbook/1.2.643.5.1.13.13.11.1471 (дата обращения 25.06.2021)
10. Митьков В.В., Митькова М.Д., Салтыкова В.Г. Микроультразвуковое исследование - новые технологии, новые возможности. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2021; 1: 89-99. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2021-1-89-99
11. Zhu Y.C., Shan J., Zhang Y., Jiang Q., Wang Y.B., Deng S.H., Qu Q.H., Li Q. Prostate cancer vascularity: superb microvascular imaging ultrasonography with histopathology correlation. Med. Sci. Monit. 2019; 25: 8571-8578. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.918318
12. Barr R.G., Cosgrove D., Brock M., Cantisani V., Correas J.M., Postema A.W., Salomon G., Tsutsumi M., Xu H.X., Dietrich C.F. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 5. Prostate. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2017; 43 (1): 27-48. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.06.020
13. Saftoiu A., Gilja O.H., Sidhu P.S., Dietrich C.F., Cantisani V., Amy D., Bachmann-Nielsen M., Bob F., Bojunga J., Brock M., Calliada F., Clevert D.A., Correas J.M., D’Onofrio M., Ewertsen C., Farrokh A., Fodor D., Fusaroli P., Havre R.F., Hocke M., Ignee A., Jenssen C., Klauser A.S., Kollmann C., Radzina M., Ramnarine K.V., Sconfienza L.M., Solomon C., Sporea I., Ștefanescu H., Tanter M., Vilmann P. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of elastography in nonhepatic applications: update 2018. Ultraschall Med. 2019; 40 (4): 425-453. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0838-9937
14. Sidhu P.S., Cantisani V., Dietrich C.F., Gilja O.H., Saftoiu A., Bartels E., Bertolotto M., Calliada F., Clevert D.A., Cosgrove D., Deganello A., D’Onofrio M., Drudi F.M., Freeman S., Harvey C., Jenssen C., Jung E.M., Klauser A.S., Lassau N., Meloni M.F., Leen E., Nicolau C., Nolsoe C., Piscaglia F., Prada F., Prosch H., Radzina M., Savelli L., Weskott H.P., Wijkstra H. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-hepatic applications: update 2017 (long version). Ultraschall Med. 2018; 39 (2): e2-e44. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0586-1107
15. Кадрев А.В., Митькова М.Д., Рязанцев А.А., Камалов А.А., Митьков В.В. Количественный анализ трансректального ультразвукового исследования с контрастным усилением в диагностике рака предстательной железы (абсолютные параметры): предварительные результаты. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2020; 2: 13-26. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2020-2-13-26
16. Tienza A., Hevia M., Benito A., Pascual J.I., Zudaire J.J., Robles J.E. MRI factors to predict urinary incontinence after retropubic/laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2015; 47 (8): 1343-1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1019-8
17. Ikarashi D., Kato Y., Kanehira M., Takata R., Ito A., Onoda M., Kato R., Matsuura T., Iwasaki K., Obara W. Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2018; 16 (1): 224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1523-2
18. Kim L.H.C., Patel A., Kinsella N., Sharabiani M.T.A., Ap Dafydd D., Cahill D. Association between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based urethral parameters and continence recovery following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol. Focus. 2020; 6 (5): 1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.011
19. Капустин В.В., Громов А.И., Широкорад В.И. Эхографическая картина области цистоуретрального анастомоза после радикальной простатэктомии. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2012; 2: 25-43.
20. Nguyen D.P., Giannarini G., Seiler R., Schiller R., Thoeny H.C., Thalmann G.N., Studer U.E. Local recurrence after retropubic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer does not exclusively occur at the anastomotic site. BJU Int. 2013; 112 (4): E243-E249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11506.x
21. Hernandez D., Salas D., Gimenez D., Buitrago P., Esquena S., Palou J., de la Torre P., Pernas J., Gich I., de Segura G.G., Craven-Bartle J., Sancho G. Pelvic MRI findings in relapsed prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Radiat. Oncol. 2015; 10: 262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0574-6
22. Korman H.J., Watson R.B., Civantos F., Block N.L., Soloway M.S. Radical prostatectomy: is complete resection of the seminal vesicles really necessary? J. Urol. 1996; 156 (3): 1081-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65709-4
23. Rosenberg S., Pode D., Shapiro A., Zorn K.C., Shalhav A.L., Gofrit O.N. The fate of the seminal vesicle remnant after proximal transection or ligation: an animal model. J. Urol. 2009; 181 (3): 1483-1486.
24. Davis M., Egan J., Marhamati S., Galfano A., Kowalczyk K.J. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted robotic prostatectomy: past, present, and future. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2021; 48 (1): 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2020.09.012
25. Wikimedia Foundation. 2014. WikiJournal of medicine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostatectomy#/media/File:Prostate_Removal.png (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license).
Review
For citations:
Kapustin V.V., Mitkova M.D. Transrectal ultrasound of prostatectomy bed. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2021;(3):10-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2021-3-10-36
Views:
431
Email this article 