The #Enzian classification for ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis: description and explanation of the classification using our own clinical cases
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-091
Abstract
An extensive deep infiltrating endometriosis usually requires complex and time-consuming surgical treatment, often with multidisciplinary surgery teams forming. The goal of ultrasound is to find and describe in detail, if possible, all endometriosis lesions at the preoperative stage. A structured classification is needed for a detailed description of all foci of pelvic and extrapelvic endometriosis that would be understandable to both the radiologists and the gynecological surgeon. The current version of the #Enzian classification was designed by an international team of scientists from 11 countries with vast experience in the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. This classification is based on a description of the location of endometriosis lesions, the depth of invasion into the pelvic organs and tissues, as well as the presence of invasion into adjacent abdominal organs and disruption of their functions. The classification provides continuity between preoperative imaging and surgical assessment of the severity of endometriosis. In this article, we tried to describe and comment in detail on the ultrasound version of this classification, illustrated by our own clinical cases. Using the #Enzian classification provides clinicians with a common “language” to describe endometriosis in a comprehensive and easily reproducible manner. The authors of this article have been using the #Enzian classification in their work for more than 2 years. Based on our existing experience, we consider the #Enzian classification not only convenient and useful, but also meets all the requirements of both a diagnostician and a surgeon.
About the Authors
E. A. BorisovaRussian Federation
Elena A. Borisova – Cand. of Sci. (Med.), assistant of the Department of operative gynecology of the Institute of postgraduate education of the Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University; LLC “MedikoProfi” – “Borisov Diagnostic and Treatment Clinic”, ultrasound diagnostics doctor, Krasnoyarsk
M. N. Bulanov
Russian Federation
Mikhail N. Bulanov – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Head of Ultrasound Diagnostics Department, Regional Clinical Hospital, Vladimir; Professor, Division of Internal Medicine, Institute of Medical Education, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod
T. A. Makarenko
Tatyana A. Makarenko – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of operative gynecology of the Institute of postgraduate education of the Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Di Giovanni A., Casarella L., Coppola M. et al. Ultrasound Evaluation of Retrocervical and Parametrial Deep Endometriosis on the Basis of Surgical Anatomic Landmarks. J. Minim. Invasive. Gynecol. 2022; 29 (10): 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.06.014
2. Keckstein J., Hoopmann M. Endometriosis, ultrasound and #Enzian classification: the need for a common language for non-invasive diagnostics. Ultraschall Med. 2023; 44 (3): 233–239. English, German. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2055-6712
3. Becker C.M., Bokor A., Heikinheimo O. et al.; ESHRE Endometriosis Guideline Group. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum. Reprod Open. 2022; 2022 (2): hoac009. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac009
4. Huffman J.W. External endometriosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1951; 62 (6): 1243–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(51)90050-6
5. Ailamazyan E.K., Yarmolinskaya M.I., Molotkov A.S., Tsitskareva D.Z. Classification of endometriosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases. 2017; 66: 77–92. (In Russian)
6. Keckstein J., Ulrich U., Possover M., Schweppe K.W. ENZIAN-Klassifikation der tief infiltrierenden Endometriose. Zentralbl. Gynäkol. 2003; 125 291
7. Keckstein J., Saridogan E., Ulrich U.A. et al. The #Enzian classification: a comprehensive non-invasive and surgical description system for endometriosis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2021; 100 (7): 1165–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14099
8. Leonardi M., Robledo K.P., Espada M. et al. SonoPODography: A new diagnostic technique for visualizing superficial endometriosis. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020; 254: 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.051
9. Bailey F., Gaughran J., Mitchell S. et al. Diagnosis of superficial endometriosis on transvaginal ultrasound by visualization of peritoneum of pouch of Douglas. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2024; 63 (1): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27529
10. Guerriero S., Condous G., van den Bosch T. et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 48 (3): 318–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15955
11. Guerriero S., Condous G., Rolla M. et al. Addendum to the consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27558
12. Borisova E.A., Bulanov M.N., Makarenko T.A. Ultrasound image of ovarian endometrioma as an indicator of external genital endometriosis. Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics. 2023; 3: 37–49. https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2023-3-37-49 (In Russian)
13. Leonardi M., Condous G. How to perform an ultrasound to diagnose endometriosis. Australas J. Ultrasound Med. 2018; 21 (2): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12093
14. Aas-Eng M.K., Lieng M., Dauser B. et al. Transvaginal sonography determines accurately extent of infiltration of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 58 (6): 933–939. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23728
15. Van den Bosch T., Dueholm M., Leone F.P. et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 46 (3): 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14806
16. Harmsen M.J., Van den Bosch T., de Leeuw R.A. et al. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 60 (1): 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24786
17. Carfagna P., De Cicco Nardone C., De Cicco Nardone A. et al. Role of transvaginal ultrasound in evaluation of ureteral involvement in deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 51 (4): 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17524
18. Guerriero S., Conway F., Pascual M.A. et al. Ultrasonography and Atypical Sites of Endometriosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10 (6): 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060345
19. Keckstein J., Hoopmann M., Merz E. et al. Expert opinion on the use of transvaginal sonography for presurgical staging and classification of endometriosis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2023; 307 (1): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06766-z
20. Montanari E., Bokor A., Szabó G. et al. Accuracy of sonography for non-invasive detection of ovarian and deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification: prospective multicenter diagnostic accuracy study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2022; 59 (3): 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24833
21. Di Giovanni A., Montanari E., Hudelist G. et al. Comparison Between Sonography-Based and Surgical Evaluation of Endometriotic Lesions Using the #Enzian Classification – A Retrospective Data Analysis. Ultraschall Med. 2023; 44 (3): 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1713-3573
22.
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Borisova E.A., Bulanov M.N., Makarenko T.A. The #Enzian classification for ultrasound diagnosis of endometriosis: description and explanation of the classification using our own clinical cases. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2024;(1):88-112. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-091