Triphasic diastolic transmitral and intraventricular blood flows and their relationship with LV diastolic dysfunction according to echocardiography
https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-092
Abstract
An acceleration of blood flow in the diastasis phase with the formation of the so-called L-wave may be found in some patients. The transmitral blood flow is transformed into a triphasic in the presence of L-wave.
Objective: to assess the frequency of L-wave presence and to evaluate the relationship between the presence of L-wave in Doppler imaging of left ventricular blood flow, transmitral blood flow at the level of the mitral valve leaflets, and modern criteria for assessing left ventricular diastolic function.
Material and methods. The study included 105 patients (age 62.21 ± 11.97 (29–91) years, 61 men) with sinus rhythm. From a total of examined patients, 30 were conditionally healthy, 64 patients suffered from coronary heart disease, and 11 suffered from arterial hypertension. Pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasound of transmitral flow was performed in the apical 4-chamber view with the sample volume located at the level of the ends of the mitral valve leaflets, as well as at the level of the basal and middle segments of the left ventricle. The distinct positive wave on the spectrogram during the diastasis phase with a speed exceeding 20 cm/s was considered an additional L-wave, and such blood flow in diastole was considered triphasic.
Results. Triphasic transmitral blood flow was found in 9 patients (8.5%), and triphasic intraventricular blood flow in another 30 patients (28.5%). Patients with triphasic transmitral blood flow were older, with a greater left atrial volume index, and LV diastolic dysfunction was more often detected compared to patients with triphasic intraventricular blood flow (66.7% compared to 23.3%, p = 0.042).
Conclusion. Triphasic transmitral blood flow is revealing significantly less frequently than triphasic intraventricular blood flow (8.5% compared to 28.5%, p < 0.001). Triphasic transmitral blood flow is more often observed in patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
About the Authors
M. N. AlekhinRussian Federation
Mikhail N. Alekhin – Doct. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Functional Diagnostics Department, Central Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation; Professor, Division of Therapy, Cardiology, Functional Diagnostics, and Nephrology, Central State Medical Academy of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, Moscow. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9725-7528
A. M. Grishin
Russian Federation
Aleksey M. Grishin – Cand. Sci. (Med.), doctor of functional diagnostics, Central Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic of Department of Presidential Affairs, Moscow. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7102-5614
A. V. Skripnikova
Russian Federation
Anna V. Skripnikova – doctor of functional diagnostics, Central Clinical Hospital with Outpatient Clinic of Department of Presidential Affairs, Moscow. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3541-0834
A. Yu. Kapustina
Russian Federation
Anastasiya Yu. Kapustina – functional diagnostics doctor, Central Clinical Hospital of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation; Assistant Professor, Central State Medical Academy of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation, Moscow. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-9783
References
1. Hatle L. Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of diastolic function in hypertensive cardiomyopathies. Eur. Heart J. 1993; 14, Suppl. J: 88–94. PMID: 8281971
2. Di Virgilio E., Monitillo F., Santoro D. et al. Mid-Diastolic Events (L Events): A Critical Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10 (23): 5654. http://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235654
3. Masai K., Mano T., Goda A. et al. Correlates and Prognostic Values of Appearance of L Wave in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved vs. Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circ. J. 2018; 82 (9): 2311–2316. http://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0417
4. Su H.M., Lin T.H., Hsu P.C. et al. Incremental prognostic value of identifying mitral L wave in patients with atrial fibrillation. Int. J. Cardiol. 2013; 168 (4): 4501–4503. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.118
5. Ghosh E., Caruthers S.D., Kovács S.J. E-wave generated intraventricular diastolic vortex to L-wave relation: model-based prediction with in vivo validation. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985). 2014; 117 (3): 316–324. http://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00215.2014
6. Lang R.M., Badano L.P., Mor-Avi V. et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2015; 16 (3): 233–270. http://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev014
7. Nagueh S.F., Smiseth O.A., Appleton C.P. et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2016; 29 (4): 277–314. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2016.01.011
8. Ha J.W., Oh J.K., Redfield M.M. et al. Triphasic mitral inflow velocity with middiastolic filling: clinical implications and associated echocardiographic findings. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2004; 17 (5): 428–431. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2004.02.007
9. Kim S.A., Son J., Shim C.Y. et al. Long-term outcome of patients with triphasic mitral flow with a mid-diastolic L wave: prognostic role of left atrial volume and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2017; 33 (9): 1377–1384. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1122-2
10. Merdler I., Richert E., Hochstadt A. et al. Echocardiographic L-wave as a prognostic indicator in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2020; 36 (10): 1897–1905. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01903-8
11. Lam C.S., Han L., Oh J.K. et al. The mitral annular middiastolic velocity curve: functional correlates and clinical significance in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2008; 21 (2): 165–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2007.05.027
12. Masai K., Mano T., Goda A. et al. Correlates and Prognostic Values of Appearance of L Wave in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved vs. Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circ. J. 2018; 82 (9): 2311–2316. http://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0417
13. Saito C., Minami Y., Arai K. et al. Prognostic Significance of the Mitral L-Wave in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2020; 130: 130–136. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.040
14. Keren G., Meisner J.S., Sherez J. et al. Interrelationship of mid-diastolic mitral valve motion, pulmonary venous flow, and transmitral flow. Circulation. 1986; 74 (1): 36–44. http://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.74.1.36
15. Lam C.S., Han L., Oh J.K. et al.The mitral annular middiastolic velocity curve: functional correlates and clinical significance in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2008; 21 (2): 165–170. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2007.05.027
16. Ghosh E., Caruthers S.D., Kovács S.J. E-wave generated intraventricular diastolic vortex to L-wave relation: model-based prediction with in vivo validation. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985). 2014; 117 (3): 316–324. http://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00215.2014
Supplementary files
Review
For citations:
Alekhin M.N., Grishin A.M., Skripnikova A.V., Kapustina A.Yu. Triphasic diastolic transmitral and intraventricular blood flows and their relationship with LV diastolic dysfunction according to echocardiography. Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2024;(3):9-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-092