Preview

Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics

Advanced search

Ultrasound in foot lesion diagnosis (Morton’s neuroma, lipofibroma)

https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2021-1-65-88

Abstract

Objective: To assess the value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of metatarsal region lesions, in particular, Morton’s neuroma and lipofibroma. Material and methods: The main group consisted of 144 patients with metatarsal pain radiating into the toes and metatarsal mass on ultrasound. Exclusion criteria were: the poor visualization of region of interest, previous surgery of Morton’s neuroma, an acute foot injury, the absence of morphological verification. The control group consisted of 25 patients with absence of symptoms and history of foot pathology. According to the morphological data main group was subdivided to subgroup of Morton’s neuroma (132 patients, 148 lesions) and subgroup of lipofibroma (12 patients, 12 lesions). In most cases masses occurred in females (92.4% of patients with Morton’s neuroma and 83.3% of patients with lipofibroma). In subgroup of Morton’s neuroma 55.3% of patients were aged 40-59 years. Ultrasound examination was performed with the use of iU22 scanner (Philips, Netherlands) with a 5-12 MHz linear probe and Logiq P-5 scanner (GE Healthcare, USA) with a 3-10 MHz linear probe. Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain) was used to assess the correlation between the size of lesion and pain severity. Results: In subgroup of Morton’s neuroma 64.9% of lesions were localized in the third intermetatarsal space, 31.1% in the second intermetatarsal space, and 4.1% in the first intermetatarsal space. In subgroup of lipofibroma 66.7% of lesions were localized in the second intermetatarsal space, 25.0% in the third intermetatarsal space, and 8.3% in the fourth intermetatarsal space. In B-mode ultrasound the hypoechogenicity of the lesion was the main diagnostic criterion of Morton’s neuroma (100.0%). In Doppler ultrasound the main diagnostic criterion for lipofibroma was the presence of vascularization (100.0%), whereas Morton’s neuroma was completely avascular in 100.0% of cases. There were no statistical differences of linear dimensions, area, and volume of lesions between subgroups (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). There were no significant differences between linear dimensions, area, and volume of lesions assessed by ultrasound and intraoperatively (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). The thickness of common plantar digital nerves proximal to the lesion location in the main group was significantly higher compared to the control group (P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between the severity of pain and the maximal size of lesions (rS = 0.1, P > 0.05 for both ultrasound and intraoperative size assessment). Conclusion: Ultrasound allows differential diagnosis of Morton’s neuroma and such a rare tumor as lipofibroma, against the background of similar symptoms.

About the Authors

V. G. Saltykova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation


D. R. Ramonova
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation


L. G. Makinyan
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University); City Clinical Hospital No. 13
Russian Federation


V. T. Zeynalov
National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov
Russian Federation


A. V. Shtok
National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko
Russian Federation


V. V. Mitkov
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Russian Federation


References

1. Burzykowski T., Molenberghs G., Abeck D., Haneke E., Hay R., Katsambas A., Roseeuw D., van de Kerkhof P., van Aelst R., Marynissen G. High prevalence of foot diseases in Europe: results of the Achilles Project. Mycoses. 2003; 46 (11-12): 496-505. https://doi.Org/10.1046/j.0933-7407. 2003.00933.x

2. Бобров Д.С., Слиняков Л.Ю., Ригин Н.В. Перегрузочная метатарзалгия: патогенез, биомеханика и хирургическое лечение (аналитический обзор литературы). Вестник Российской академии медицинских наук. 2017; 72 (1): 53-58. https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn756

3. Международная классификация болезней 10-го пересмотра (МКБ-10). https://mkb-10.com/index. php?pid=5243) (дата обращения 20.01.2021)

4. Jain S., Mannan K. The diagnosis and management of Morton’s neuroma: a literature review. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013; 6 (4): 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640013493464

5. Betts L. Morton’s metatarsalgia: neuritis of the fourth digital nerve. Med. J. Aust. 1940; 1: 514-515.

6. Thomson C.E., Gibson J.N., Martin D. Interventions for the treatment of Morton’s neuroma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2004; (3): CD003118. https:// doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003118.pub2

7. Beggs I. Sonographic appearances of nerve tumors. J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1999; 27 (7): 363-368. https:// doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097- 0096(199909)27:7 % 3 C 3 6 3 : : a i d - jcu1%3E3.0.co;2-7

8. Reimers C.D., Gaulrapp H., Kele H. Sonographie der Muskeln, Sehnen und Nerven. Koln: Deutscher Airzteverlag, 2004. pp. 223-233.

9. Салтыкова В.Г., Левин А.Н. Возможности ультразвуковой диагностики невромы Мортона. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2007; 5: 92-98.

10. МакНелли Ю. Ультразвуковые исследования костно-мышечной системы: практическое руководство. М.: Видар, 2007. 395 с.

11. Foo L.F., Raby N. Tumours and tumour-like lesions in the foot and ankle. Clin. Radiol. 2005; 60 (3): 308-332. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.crad.2004.05.010

12. Bancroft L.W., Peterson J.J., Kransdorf M.J. Imaging of soft tissue lesions of the foot and ankle. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2008; 46 (6): 1093-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2008.08.007

13. Пугачева Е.Н., Корышков Н.А., Корышкова Л.В. Возможности комплексной ультразвуковой диагностики доброкачественных мягкотканных образований стопы и голеностопного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2010; 55 (1): 62-67.

14. Холин А.В., Пугачева Е.Н., Корышков Н.А., Корышкова Л.В., Корсун А.А. Возможности ультразвуковой диагностики патологии стопы и голеностопного сустава. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2009; 5 (1): 65-72.

15. Scott J., Huskisson E.C. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976; 2 (2): 175-184.

16. Nery C., Raduan F., Del Buono A., Asaumi I.D., Maffulli N. Plantar approach for excision of a Morton neuroma: a long-term follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2012; 94 (7): 654-658. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.k.00122

17. Womack J.W., Richardson D.R., Murphy G.A., Richardson E.G., Ishikawa S.N. Long-term evaluation of interdigital neuroma treated by surgical excision. Foot Ankle Int. 2008; 29 (6): 574-547. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2008.0574

18. Valero J., Gallart J., Gonzalez D., Deus J., Lahoz M. Multiple interdigital neuromas: a retrospective study of 279 feet with 462 neuromas. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54 (3): 320-322. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2014.05.011

19. Ormeci T., Guler O., Malkoc M., Keskinbora M., Gungoren F.Z., Mahirogullari M. Diagnostic value of elastography in the diagnosis of intermetatarsal neuroma. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55 (4): 720-726. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.025

20. Peters P.G., Adams S.B. Jr., Schon L.C. Interdigital neuralgia. Foot Ankle Clin. 2011; 16 (2): 305-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2011.01.010

21. Civinini F. Su di un gangliare rigonfiamento della pianta del piede. Mem. Chir. Arcispedale di Pistoia. 1835.

22. Durlacher L.A. A Treatise on Corns, Bunions, the Disease of Nails, and the General Management of Feet. London: Simpkin, Marshall and Co, 1855. 242 p.

23. Morton T.G. A peculiar and painful affection of the fourth metatarso-phalangeal articulation. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1876; 71 (141): 37-45.

24. Raouf T., Rogero R., McDonald E., Fuchs D., Shakked R.J., Winters B.S., Daniel J.N., Pedowitz D.I., Raikin S.M. Value of preoperative imaging and intraoperative histopathology in Morton’s neuroma. Foot Ankle Int. 2019; 40 (9): 1032-1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719851121

25. Kim J.Y., Choi J.H., Park J., Wang J., Lee I. An anatomical study of Morton’s interdigital neuroma: the relationship between the occurring site and the deep transverse metatarsal ligament (DTML). Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28 (9): 1007-1010. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2007.1007

26. Quinn T.J., Jacobson J.A., Craig J.G., van Holsbeeck M.T. Sonography of Morton’s neuromas. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000; 174 (6): 1723-1728. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.6.1741723

27. Wu K.K. Morton’s interdigital neuroma: a clinical review of its etiology, treatment, and results. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 1996; 35 (2): 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1067-2516(96)80027-5

28. Symeonidis P.D., Iselin L.D., Simmons N., Fowler S., Dracopoulos G., Stavrou P. Prevalence of interdigital nerve enlargements in an asymptomatic population. Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33 (7): 543-547. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2012.0543

29. Samaila E., Colo G., Rava A., Negri S., Valentini R., Felli L., Magnan B. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections in Civinini-Morton’s syndrome: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020: S1268-7731(20)30081-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2020.05.001

30. Pisani G. Is it Morton’s or Civinini’s syndrome? Foot Ankle Surg. 2010; 16 (3): 105-106. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.fas.2009.07.006

31. Larson E.E., Barrett S.L., Battiston B., Maloney C.T. Jr., Dellon A.L. Accurate nomenclature for forefoot nerve entrapment: a historical perspective. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2005; 95 (3): 298-306. https://doi.org/10.7547/0950298

32. Parker R.G., Merced-O’Neil O. Management of painful recurrent intermetatarsal neuroma using processed porcine extracellular matrix material: a case report. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 2016; 33 (2): 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2015.11.001

33. Scardina R.J., Lee S.M. Morton neuroma. In: Frontera W.R., Silver J.K., Rizzo T.D. (eds.). Essentials of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2nd ed. London: W.B. Saunders, 2008, pp. 465-468.

34. Nissen K.I. Plantar digital neuritis; Morton’s metatarsalgia. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1948; 30B (1): 84-94.

35. Ringertz N., Unander-Scharin M. Morton’s disease: a clinical and pathoanatomical study. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1959; 19: 327.

36. Meachim G., Abberton M.J. Histological findings in Morton’s metatarsalgia. J. Pathol. 1971; 103 (4): 209-217.

37. Root M.L., Orien W.P., Weed J.H. Normal and Abnormal Function of the Foot. Los Angeles: Clinical Biomechanics Corporation, 1977. 478 p.

38. Bossley C.J., Cairney P.C. The intermetatarsophalangeal bursa - its significance in Morton’s meta-tarsalgia. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1980; 62-B (2): 184-187. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x. 62b2.7364832

39. Пахомов И.А., Садовой М.А., Прохоренко В.М., Кириллова И.А., Стрыгин А.В. Особенности диагностики и лечения пациентов с невромой Мортона. Травматология и ортопедия России. 2008; 49 (3): 42-44.

40. Stecco C., Fantoni I., Macchi V., Del Borrello M., Porzionato A., Biz C., De Caro R. The role of fasciae in Civinini-Morton’s syndrome. J. Anat. 2015; 227 (5): 654-664. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12371

41. Лаукарт Е.Б., Байдина О.И., Арцыбашева М.В., Гордеев А.В. Болезнь Мортона. Клиническая медицина. 2006; 11: 70-73.

42. Saragas N.P. Hydrocortisone/local anaesthetic injection versus ultrasound in the diagnosis of interdigital neuroma. Foot Ankle Surg. 2006; 12 (3): 149-151.

43. Park Y.H., Kim T.J., Choi G.W., Kim H.J. Prediction of clinical prognosis according to inter-metatarsal distance and neuroma size on ultrasonography in Morton neuroma: a prospective observational study. J. Ultrasound Med. 2019; 38 (4): 1009-1014. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14787

44. Climent J.M., Mondéjar-Gomez F., Rodriguez- Ruiz C., Dfaz-Llopis I., Gomez-Gallego D., Martfn- Medina P. Treatment of Morton neuroma with botulinum toxin A: a pilot study. Clin. Drug Investig. 2013; 33 (7): 497-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40261-013-0090-0

45. Bignotti B., Signori A., Sormani M.P., Molfetta L., Martinoli C., Tagliafico A. Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for Morton neuroma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2015; 25 (8): 2254-2262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3633-3

46. Mahadevan D., Venkatesan M., Bhatt R., Bhatia M. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for Morton’s neuroma compared with ultrasonography. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54 (4): 549-553. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2014.09.021

47. Fazal M.A., Khan I., Thomas C. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Morton’s neuroma. J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc. 2012; 102 (3): 184-186. https://doi.org/10.7547/1020184

48. Sharp R.J., Wade C.M., Hennessy M.S., Saxby T.S. The role of MRI and ultrasound imaging in Morton’s neuroma and the effect of size of lesion on symptoms. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2003; 85 (7): 999-1005. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x. 85b7.12633

49. Gimber L.H., Melville D.M., Bocian D.A., Krupinski E.A., Guidice M.P., Taljanovic M.S. Ultrasound evaluation of Morton neuroma before and after laser therapy. AJRAm. J. Roentgenol. 2017; 208 (2): 380-385. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.16403

50. Шайхутдинов И.И., Масгутов Р.Ф., Валеева Л.Р., Ягудин Р.Х. Неврома Мортона как причина болей в стопе - диагностика и тактика лечения. Практическая медицина. 2016; 1 (4): 182-186.

51. Истомина И.С., Левин А.Н., Кузьмин В.И., Еськин Н.А., Банаков В.В., Берченко Г.Н. Болезнь Мортона как синдром интерметатарзального канала. Вестник травматологи и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2006; 1: 76-82.

52. Xu Z., Duan X., Yu X., Wang H., Dong X., Xiang Z. The accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of Morton’s neuroma: a systematic review. Clin. Radiol. 2015; 70 (4): 351-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2014.10.017

53. Хабиров Ф.А. Болевые синдромы в нижних конечностях. Практическая медицина. 2017; 1 (102): 13-21.

54. Di Caprio F., Meringolo R., Shehab Eddine M., Ponziani L. Morton’s interdigital neuroma of the foot: A literature review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018; 24 (2): 92-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.01.007

55. Kransdorf M.J. Benign soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of specific diagnoses by age, sex, and location. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1995; 164 (2): 395-402. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.2.7839977

56. Bencardino J., Rosenberg Z.S., Beltran J., Liu X., Marty-Delfaut E. Morton’s neuroma: is it always symptomatic? AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000; 175 (3): 649-653. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750649

57. Thomson L., Aujla R.S., Divall P., Bhatia M. Non-surgical treatments for Morton’s neuroma: A systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020; 26 (7): 736743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.09.009

58. Adams W.R. 2nd. Morton’s neuroma. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. 2010; 27 (4): 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.cpm.2010.06.004

59. Pérez-Domfnguez B., Casana-Granell J. The effects of a combined physical therapy approach on Morton's Neuroma. An N-of-1 Case Report. Foot (Edinb). 2020; 44: 101684. https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.foot.2020.101684

60. Clinical Practice Guideline Forefoot Disorders Panel, Thomas J.L., Blitch E.L. 4th, Chaney D.M., Dinucci K.A., Eickmeier K., Rubin L.G., Stapp M.D., Vanore J.V. Diagnosis and treatment of forefoot disorders. Section 3. Morton’s intermetatarsal neuroma. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009; 48 (2): 251-256. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2008.12.005


Review

For citations:


Saltykova V.G., Ramonova D.R., Makinyan L.G., Zeynalov V.T., Shtok A.V., Mitkov V.V. Ultrasound in foot lesion diagnosis (Morton’s neuroma, lipofibroma). Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2021;(1):65-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24835/1607-0771-2021-1-65-88

Views: 1324


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1607-0771 (Print)
ISSN 2408-9494 (Online)