Ультразвуковое исследование с контрастным усилением у детей - возможности применения в онкологической практике
Аннотация
Приведен обзор литературы о применении ультразвукового исследования с контрастным усилением в педиатрии, в том числе в детской онкологии, который показывает все преимущества данного метода обследования. Изложены общепризнанные на сегодняшний день показания и противопоказания к ультразвуковому исследованию с контрастным усилением. Представлены основные ультразвуковые контрастные препараты и их официально разрешенные области применения. Проанализированы данные клинических исследований, указывающие на безопасность применения ультразвуковых контрастных препаратов в детском возрасте. Приведены результаты применения ультразвукового исследования с контрастным усилением для дифференциальной диагностики очаговых поражений печени и динамической оценки кровоснабжения опухоли при проведении таргетной терапии, направленной на подавление ангиогенеза.
Об авторах
Елена Владимировна Феоктистова
ФГБУ “Федеральный научно-клинический центр детской гематологии, онкологии и иммунологии имени Дмитрия Рогачева” Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Россия
Россия
Л. А. Белякова
ФГБУ “Федеральный научно-клинический центр детской гематологии, онкологии и иммунологии имени Дмитрия Рогачева” Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Россия
Россия
С. Р. Варфоломеева
ФГБУ “Федеральный научно-клинический центр детской гематологии, онкологии и иммунологии имени Дмитрия Рогачева” Министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Tranquart F., Correas J.M., Ladam Marcus V. et al. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the evaluation fo cal liver lesions: diagnostic efficacy and economic issues from a French multicentric study // J. Radiol. 2009. V. 90. No. 1. P. 109-122.
2. Darge K. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in children: ready for the prime time in the United States // Pediatr. Radiol. 2011. V. 41. No. 11. P. 1486-1488.
3. Bartolotta T.V., Taibbi A., Midiri M. et al. Indeterminate focal liver lesions incidentally discovered at grey-scale US. Role of contrast-enhanced sonography // Invest. Radiol. 2011. V. 46. No. 2. P. 106-115.
4. Dezsofi A., McLin V., Hadzic N. Hepatic neoplasms in children: a focus on differential diagnosis // Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2014. V. 38. No. 4. P. 399-402.
5. Bernatik T., Sertz K., Blank W. et al. Unclear focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography - lessons to be learned from the DEGUM multicenter study for the characterization of liver tumors // Ultraschall Med. 2010. V. 31. No. 6. P. 577-581.
6. Chami L., Lassau N., Malka D. et al. Benefits of contrast-enhanced sonography for the detection of liver lesions: comparison with histologic findings // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008. V. 190. No. 3. P. 683-690.
7. Claudon M., Dietrich C., Choi B.I. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012. A WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS // Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2013. V. 39. No. 2. P. 187-210.
8. Piscaglia F., Nolsoe C., Dietrich C. et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications // Ultraschall Med. 2012. V. 33. No. 1. P. 33-59.
9. CEUS around the world: where, which agents and how they are used // International Contrast Ultrasound Society. Режим доступа: // http://www.icus-society.org/attachments/article/103/ICUS%20-%20CEUS%20Around%20the%20World.pdf, свободный. Загл. с экрана. 20.08.2016.
10. Dietrich C., Braden B., Hocke M. et al. Improved characterization of solitary solid pancreatic tumors using contrast enhanced transabdominal ultrasound // J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2008. V. 134. No. 6. P. 635-643.
11. Minimum training requirements for the practice of medical ultrasound in Europe // Ultraschall Med. 2010. V. 31. No. 4. P. 426-427.
12. ESUR guidelines on contrast media // Eur. Radiol. 2001. V. 21. No. 12. P. 2527-2541.
13. Wilson S.R., Burns P.N. Microbubble enhanced US in body imaging: what role? // Radiology. 2010. V. 257. No. 1. P. 24-39.
14. Cosgrove D., Eckersly R. Contrast enhanced ultrasound: basic physics and technology overview // Enhancing the Role of Ultrasound with Contrast Agents / Ed. by R. Lencioni. Milan: Springer-Verlag, 2006. P. 3-14.
15. Dawson P., Cosgrove D., Grainger R. Textbook of Contrast Media. Oxford: ISIS Medical Media, 1999. P. 239-247.
16. Burns P.N. Basics // Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound / Ed. by H.P. Weskott. Bremen: UNI-MED Verlag AG, 2011. P. 13-21.
17. Weskott H.P. Examination strategies, tips and techniques // Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound / Ed. by H.P. Weskott. Bremen: UNI-MED Verlag AG, 2011. P. 31-43.
18. Schief R. Ultrasound contrast agents // Curr. Opin. Radiol. 1991. V. 3. No. 2. P. 198-207.
19. Coley B.D. Future of pediatric US // Pediatr. Radiol. 2011. V. 41. No. 1. P. 220-227.
20. Kis E., Nyitrai A., Varkoniy I. et al. Voiding ultrasonography with second-generation contrast agent versus voiding cystourethrography // Pediatr. Nephrol. 2010. V. 25. No. 11. P. 2289-2293.
21. Wozniak M.M., Wieczorek A.P., Pawelec A. et al. Two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and real-time (4D) contrast enhanced voiding urosonography (ce-VUS) versus voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) in children with vesicouretheral reflux // Eur. J. Radiol. 2016. V. 85. No. 6. P. 1238-1245.
22. Zimbaro G., Ascenti G., Visalli C. et al. Contrastenhanced ultrasonography (voiding urosonography) of vesicoureteral reflux: state of the art // Radiol. Med. 2007. V. 112. No. 8. P. 1211-1224.
23. Papadopoulou F., Ntoulia A., Siornou E. et al. Safety of intravesical use of second generation US contrast agent in children for vesicouretheral reflux detection // ECR 2011 Book of Abstracts. S. B736.
24. Conroy S., Choonara I., Impiccaitore P. et al. Survey of unlicensed and off label drug use in paediatric wards in European countries // BMJ. 2000. V. 320. No. 7227. P. 79-82.
25. Piskunowicz M., Kosiak W., Irga N. Primum non nocere? Why can’t we use second generation ultrasound contrast agents for the examinations in children? // Ultraschall Med. 2011. V. 32. No. 1. P. 83-86.
26. Riccabona M. Contrast media use in pediatrics: safety issues // Contrast Media: Safety Issues and ESUR Guidelines / Ed. by H.S. Thompson, J.A.W. Webb. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014. P. 245-251.
27. Sidhu P.S., Cantisani V., Deganello A. et al. A role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in paediatric practice: an EFSUMB position statement // Ultraschall Med. 2016. Epub ahead of print.
28. Fernandez E., Perez R., Hernandez A. et al. Factors and mechanisms for pharmacokinetic differences between pediatric population and adults // Pharmaceutics. 2011. V. 3. No. 1. P. 53-72.
29. Pandolfini C., Bonati M. A literature review on off label drug use in children // Eur. J. Pediatr. 2005. V. 164. No. 9. P. 552-558.
30. Prandstetter C., Tamesberger M., Wagner O. et al. Medical prescriptions to premature and newborn infants in an Austrian neonatal intensive care unit // Klin. Padiatr. 2009. V. 221. No. 5. P. 321-317.
31. Brenner D.J., Hall E.J. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. V. 357. No. 22. P. 2277-2284.
32. Lucignani G., DePalma D. PET/CT in pediatric oncology: clinical usefulness and domestic concerns // Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2011. V. 38. No. 1. P. 179-184.
33. Brody A.S., Frush D.P., Huda W. et al. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography // Pediatrics. 2007. V. 120. No. 3. P. 677-682.
34. Approved drug product list 2016 // Food and Drug Administration. Режим доступа: // http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/developmentapprovalprocess/ucm071118.pdf, свободный. Загл. с экрана. 25.07.2016.
35. Riccabona M. Application of a second-generation US contrast agent in infants and children - a European questionnaire-based survey // Pediatr. Radiol. 2012. V. 42. No. 12. P. 1471-1480.
36. Rasado E., Riccabona M. Off-label use of ultrasound contrast-agents for intravenous applications in children // J. Ultrasound Med. 2016. V. 35. No. 3. P. 487-496.
37. Piscaglia F., Bolondi L. Italian society for ultrasound in medicine and biology (SIUMB) study group on ultrasound contrast agents. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23 188 investigations // Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006. V. 32. No. 9. P. 1369-1375.
38. Prince M.R., Zhang H., Zou Z. et al. Incidence of immediate gadolinium contrast media reactions // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2011. V. 196. No. 2. P. 138-143.
39. Wang C.L., Cohan R.H., Ellis J.H. et al. Frequency, outcome and appropriateness of treatment of nonionic iodinated contrast media reactions // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008. V. 191. No. 2. P. 409-415.
40. McCarville M.B., Kaste S.C., Hoffer F.A. et al. Contrast enhanced sonography of malignant pediatric abdominal and pelvic solid tumors: preliminary safety and feasibility data // Pediatr. Radiol. 2012. V. 42. No. 7. P. 824-833.
41. Coleman J.L., Navid F., Furman W.L. et al. Safety of ultrasound contrast agents in pediatric oncologic population: a single-institutional experience // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2014. V. 202. No. 5. P. 966-970.
42. Harkanyi Z. Potential applications of contrastenhanced ultrasound in pediatric patients // Ultrasound Clin. North Am. 2013. V. 8. P. 403-422.
43. Strobel D., Seitz K., Blank W. et al. Contrastenhanced ultrasound for the characterization of focal liver lesions - diagnostic accuracy in clinical practice (DEGUM multicenter trial) // Ultraschall Med. 2008. V. 29. No. 5. P. 499-505.
44. Rozell J.M., Catanzano T., Polansky S.M. et al. Primary liver tumors in pediatric patients: proper imaging technique for diagnosis and staging // Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI. 2014. V. 35. No. 4. P. 382-393.
45. Meyers R. Tumors of the liver in children // Surg. Oncol. 2007. V. 16. No. 3. P. 195-203.
46. Roebuck D. Focal liver lesions in children // Pediatr. Radiol. 2008. V. 38. No. 3. P. 518-522.
47. Dietrich C.F., Kratzer W., Strobe D. et al. Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CN and MRI // World J. Gastroenterol. 2006. V. 12. No. 11. P. 1699-1705.
48. Ding H., Wang W.P., Huang B.J. et al. Imaging of focal liver lesion: low-mechanical-index real-time ultrasonography with Sonovue // J. Ultrasound Med. 2005. V. 24. No. 3. P. 285-297.
49. Claudon M., Dietrich C.F., Choi B.I. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver - update 2012 // Ultraschall Med. 2013. V. 34. No. 1. P. 11-29.
50. Dai Y., Chen M.H., Yin S.S. et al. Focal liver lesions: can Sonovue-enhanced ultrasound be used to differentiate malignant from benign lesions? // Invest. Radiol. 2007. V. 42. No. 8. P. 596-603.
51. Bhayana D., Kim T.K., Jang H.J. et al. Hypervascular liver masses on contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the importance of wash-out // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010. V. 194. No. 4. P. 977-983.
52. Dietrich C.F., Mertens J.C., Braden B. et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven liver hemangiomas // Hepatology. 2007. V. 45. No. 5. P. 1139-1145.
53. Kim T.K., Jang H.J., Burns P.N. et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: differentiation with low-mechanical index contrast-enhanced sonography // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008. V. 190. No. 1. P. 58-66.
54. Von Herbay A., Westendorff J., Gregor M. Contrastenhanced ultrasound with Sonovue: differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions in 317 patients // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2010. V. 38. No. 1. P. 1-9.
55. Fan Z.H., Chen M.H., Dai Y. et al. Evaluation of primary malignancies of the liver using contrastenhanced sonography: correlation with pathology // Am. J. Roengenol. 2006. V. 186. No. 6. P. 1512-1519.
56. Ooi C.C., Low S.C., Schneider-Kolsky M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enchanced ultrasound in differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions: a retrospective study // J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Oncol. 2010. V. 54. No. 5. P. 421-430.
57. Frank D. Intravenous-contrast enhanced sonography (CEUS) in children: single center experience // Ultraschall Med. 2013. V. 34. Suppl. P. S32.
58. Stenzel M. Intravenous contrast-enhanced sonography in children and adolescents: single center experience // J. Ultrason. 2013. V. 13. No. 53. P. 133-144.
59. Jacob J., Deganello A., Sellars M.E. et al. Contrastenhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characterization of grey-scale sonographic indeterminate focal liver lesions in pediatric practice // Ultraschall Med. 2013. V. 34. No. 6. P. 529-540.
60. Piskunowicz M., Kosiak W., Batko T. et al. Safety of intravenous application of second-generation ultrasound contrast agent in children: prospective analysis // Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2015. V. 41. No. 4. P. 1095-1099.
61. Lassau N., Chebil M., Chami L. et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US): a new tool for the evaluation of antiangiogenic treatment // Target. Oncol. 2010. V. 5. No. 1. P. 53-58.
62. Greis C. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) // Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2011. V. 49. No. 1-4. P. 137-149.
63. Rehman S., Jayson G.C. Molecular imaging of antiangiogenic agents // Oncologist. 2005. V. 10. No. 2. P. 92-103.
64. McCarville M.B., Coleman J.L., Guo J. et al. Use of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess response to angiogenic therapy in children and adolescents with solid malignancies: a pilot study // Am. J. Roengenol. 2016. V. 206. No. 5. P. 933-939.
65. Patient Study Data Registry // EFSUMB. Режим доступа: // http://www.efsumb-data.org/v1/login.asp, свободный. Загл. с экрана. 25.07.2016.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Феоктистова Е.В., Белякова Л.А., Варфоломеева С.Р. Ультразвуковое исследование с контрастным усилением у детей - возможности применения в онкологической практике. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2016;(5):22-32.
For citation:
Feoktistova E.V., Belyakova L.A., Varfolomeeva S.R. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Pediatric Oncology (Literature Review). Ultrasound & Functional Diagnostics. 2016;(5):22-32. (In Russ.)
Просмотров:
77
Послать статью по эл. почте 